Peugeot 306 MOT Results
Registered in 200258.4% pass rate
from 317 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(55% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
- 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.32% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.95% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.32% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.32% fail on Cable
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.63% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.32% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.32% fail on Lever
-
0.32% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.32% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.32% fail on Valves
- 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.32% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(55% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.32% fail on Front fog lamps
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.32% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.63% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.32% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.32% fail on Horn
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint
- 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint
- 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.2% fail on
Springs
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.2% fail on Coil spring
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.63% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint
- 0.63% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (81% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
10% fail on
Visibility
- 6.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
0.63% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.63% fail on Windscreen
- 0.32% fail on Bonnet
-
8.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.95% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.32% fail on Other leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.95% fail on
Transmission
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.95% fail on Joints
-
0.95% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.95% fail on
Doors
-
0.32% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.63% fail on
Body
- 0.63% fail on Other body component
-
0.63% fail on
Seats
- 0.63% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.32% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.32% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.95% fail on Condition
- 0.63% fail on Requirements (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
-
0.63% fail on
Power steering
- 0.32% fail on Operation
- 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.32% fail on Attachment