MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 306 » 2000

Peugeot 306 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.8% pass rate
from 2,042 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.049% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (35% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.049% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.049% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Brake linings (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Lever
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (47% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Anti-lock braking system (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.049% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.83% fail on Load sensing valves (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.64% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Pedal
    • 0.69% fail on Flexible brake hoses (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.098% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.049% fail on Servos
      • 0.049% fail on Valves
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.049% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.15% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.098% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.049% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.098% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.098% fail on Servos
  • 13% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.049% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.098% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Springs
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.049% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.049% fail on Torsion bar
      • 0.049% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Axles
      • 0.24% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.098% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.098% fail on Sub-frames (87% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (14% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (29% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.54% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
    • 0.73% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (60% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.049% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.049% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.049% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.098% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.049% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.049% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.049% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.049% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.049% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (19% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Transmission (62% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (39% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
      • 0.098% fail on Tank
      • 0.098% fail on Hose
    • 0.34% fail on Spare wheel (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Carrier (23 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.098% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.049% fail on Door condition
        • 0.049% fail on Hinge
    • 0.24% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
      • 0.098% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Chassis (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Chassis condition (86% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.049% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.049% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.049% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.049% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.049% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.049% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.098% fail on View to rear
      • 0.098% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Steering (35% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering gear (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Steering rack (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.049% fail on Other components
        • 0.049% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.098% fail on Pump
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
      • 0.049% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.049% fail on Other components
    • 0.049% fail on Steering play
      • 0.049% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (45% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Requirements
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
      • 0.049% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.15% fail on Airbags
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.88% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages