Peugeot 306 MOT Results
Registered in 199946.2% pass rate
from 4,465 tests in 2017
(10% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Brakes
(47% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Front wheels (40% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance (56% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.090% fail on Brake operation
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Components
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Valves (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Pipes
- 2.7% fail on Hoses (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Cylinders
- 0.022% fail on Servos
- 0.83% fail on Leaks (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.067% fail on Operation
-
9.7% fail on
Components
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Hub components
(46% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (64% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.11% fail on Wheel cylinder (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Brake drums
- 0.022% fail on Brake linings
- 0.022% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 1.0% fail on ABS
-
0.83% fail on
Mechanical components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Restricted movement (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Components
- 0.045% fail on Valves (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Pipes
- 0.022% fail on Servos
- 0.045% fail on Leaks
-
0.090% fail on
Components
- 0.090% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.090% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.090% fail on
Pedal
- 0.067% fail on Condition
- 0.022% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.090% fail on
Pedal
-
0.067% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.022% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.022% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.022% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.022% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.022% fail on
Hand operated control valves
- 0.022% fail on Operation
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
6.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (43% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.067% fail on All position lamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(56% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.58% fail on All direction indicators (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Tell tales
-
0.022% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.022% fail on Switch
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
0.022% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.022% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.022% fail on Matched pair
- 0.022% fail on Switch
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Battery (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.022% fail on Tell tale
- 0.43% fail on Horn
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 0.090% fail on Lamp
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.022% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
6.0% fail on
Position lamps
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Couplings
- 0.022% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.11% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
-
5.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.045% fail on Attachment
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(27% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Subframe mounting (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting (61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Spring mounting (72% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.5% fail on Front (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Rear
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (39% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Location
- 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.43% fail on
Radius arms
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.090% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Attachment
-
0.27% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Axles
- 0.090% fail on Axle beam
- 0.045% fail on Clearance (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Stub axle
- 0.022% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.16% fail on
Sub-frames
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
- 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on General condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.090% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.022% fail on Attachment
-
0.067% fail on
Torsion bars
(20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Condition (57 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.045% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.022% fail on Condition
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
18% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(57% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Emissions (54% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.94% fail on System (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Cap (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pipe
- 0.13% fail on Tank
- 0.067% fail on Hose
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(23% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Wipers (23% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Windscreen
- 0.31% fail on Mirrors
- 0.090% fail on Bonnet
- 0.022% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
9.6% fail on
Tyres
(17% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth
- 4.3% fail on Condition (21% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Size/type
- 0.090% fail on Valve stem
-
6.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(23% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Passengers airbag
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts
(22% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Requirements (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Attachment
-
0.022% fail on
Installation check
- 0.022% fail on Anchorage's
-
4.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
(36% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Steering system
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Steering rack (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
- 0.045% fail on Steering arm
-
0.69% fail on
Power steering
- 0.20% fail on Operation
- 0.20% fail on Other components
- 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.090% fail on Drive system (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Pump
- 0.045% fail on Rams
-
0.16% fail on
Steering control
- 0.090% fail on Steering wheel (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Steering column
- 0.13% fail on Steering operation
- 0.045% fail on Locking devices
-
5.4% fail on
Steering system
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.4% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Passengers
- 1.2% fail on Body condition (43% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Doors
- 0.36% fail on Passengers other
- 0.31% fail on Drivers
- 0.20% fail on Passengers front
-
0.72% fail on
Vehicle structure
(39% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Chassis (39% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.045% fail on
Load security
- 0.022% fail on Bootlid
- 0.022% fail on Tailgate
- 0.022% fail on Speedometer
-
1.4% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.34% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
- 0.090% fail on Condition
-
0.022% fail on
Towbars
- 0.022% fail on Vehicle structure