Peugeot 306 MOT Results
Registered in 199954.0% pass rate
from 1,362 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(45% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(45% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.073% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.073% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.073% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(84% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(75% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(83% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.95% fail on Brake discs
-
0.59% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(83% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Lever (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.73% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.81% fail on Flexible brake hoses (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever
-
0.22% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.073% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.22% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.22% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.15% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.073% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.22% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.073% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.073% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.073% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.073% fail on Operation
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(45% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.073% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.073% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.8% fail on
Sub-frames
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.073% fail on Ball joint
-
1.3% fail on
Springs
(45% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring (50% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Mounting
- 0.15% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.073% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.073% fail on Torsion bar
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Axles
- 0.22% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.073% fail on Axle
- 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.22% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
0.073% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.073% fail on Ball joint
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.073% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.44% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.22% fail on Horn
- 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.073% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.073% fail on Position lamp
-
0.073% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.073% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(26% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
(46% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(54% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Joints (56% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Belts
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(54% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.81% fail on
Seats
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Doors
-
0.37% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.15% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.15% fail on Door condition
-
0.073% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.073% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.37% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.073% fail on Tank
- 0.073% fail on Pipe
-
0.37% fail on
Spare wheel
(15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Carrier (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.22% fail on
Body
- 0.15% fail on Other body component
- 0.073% fail on Panel
- 0.22% fail on Undertray (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Floor
- 0.073% fail on Bumpers
-
0.073% fail on
Towbar
- 0.073% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.073% fail on
Load security
-
0.073% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.073% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.073% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.073% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.073% fail on Boot lid condition
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.15% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.15% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.073% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.073% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.073% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.44% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.073% fail on Other leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
-
0.073% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.073% fail on Windscreen
-
6.3% fail on
Steering
(70% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
-
0.22% fail on
Power steering
- 0.073% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.073% fail on Pump
- 0.073% fail on Other components
- 0.073% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.073% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.073% fail on
Steering play
- 0.073% fail on Steering rack
-
3.7% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.95% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Requirements
-
0.37% fail on
Airbags
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.073% fail on Size/type
-
0.59% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.59% fail on Registration plates
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
0.073% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.073% fail on Speedometer