MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 306 » 1999

Peugeot 306 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.6% pass rate
from 2,482 tests in 2020
(9.1% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (44% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (77% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Cable (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Load sensing valves (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (85% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Pedal
    • 0.81% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (45% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Anti-lock braking system (45% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.56% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.040% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.28% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Additional braking device (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
    • 0.081% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.081% fail on Servos
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (26% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.081% fail on Switch
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.73% fail on Horn
      • 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.040% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.040% fail on Switch
    • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamp switch
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage
      • 0.081% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.89% fail on Springs (60% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Coil springs (59% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Coil spring (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.040% fail on Torsion bar
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.040% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.36% fail on Axles
      • 0.16% fail on Axle (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (22% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (54% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission (35% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts (36% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Joints (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
      • 0.040% fail on Belts
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pipe
      • 0.040% fail on Hose
    • 0.97% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.89% fail on Chassis
      • 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.040% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Hinge
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Hinge
      • 0.081% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
    • 0.52% fail on Integral vehicle structure (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (64% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Carrier (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.081% fail on Towbar
      • 0.081% fail on Other towbar components (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Body (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Body condition
      • 0.040% fail on Other body component
    • 0.081% fail on Floor
    • 0.040% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.040% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.040% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.040% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.040% fail on Cabs
      • 0.040% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.040% fail on Undertray
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.16% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.081% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.040% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.040% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.081% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.081% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.040% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering gear (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.081% fail on Rams
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.040% fail on Steering wheel
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (29% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts (30% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Requirements
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.081% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages