Peugeot 306 MOT Results

Registered in 1998
47.3% pass rate
from 3,198 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (48% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (71% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Parking brake performance (90% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels (76% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Front wheels (96% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.094% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.031% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (65% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Components (65% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Pipes
        • 3.7% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Hoses (70% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.031% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.78% fail on Leaks (75% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Wheel cylinder (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.47% fail on Mechanical components (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Cable (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on ABS (67% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.094% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.063% fail on Components
        • 0.063% fail on Servos
      • 0.031% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.063% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.063% fail on Pedal
        • 0.031% fail on Condition
        • 0.031% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.063% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.031% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Front lamps (33% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Rear lamps (53% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators (62% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type (62% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps (75% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (27% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.031% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (49% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.063% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.84% fail on Horn
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
      • 0.031% fail on Lamp
    • 0.063% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (51% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (72% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
      • 0.031% fail on Presence
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Subframe mounting (85% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Component mounting (70% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting (72% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.063% fail on Couplings
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings (79% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear (49% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Location
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.81% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Condition (51% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Axles (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Axle beam (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Clearance (16 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.031% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.19% fail on General condition (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.031% fail on Condition
    • 0.094% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.094% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.063% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.063% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.031% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
    • 0.031% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Emissions (50% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system (48% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (71% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Cap (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on System (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.063% fail on Tank
      • 0.063% fail on Hose
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (46% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Windscreen (80% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Condition (48% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.50% fail on Size/type
    • 0.094% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (53% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering system (65% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end (93% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack (83% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.031% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.031% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
        • 0.031% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
      • 0.063% fail on Drive system
      • 0.063% fail on Rams
    • 0.19% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.063% fail on Steering control
      • 0.031% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.031% fail on Steering column
    • 0.031% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts (45% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (68% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
  • 3.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (29% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Body condition (60% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Vehicle structure (47% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Chassis (47% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers
    • 0.56% fail on Seats
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Load security (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Bootlid (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Tailgate (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.031% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.031% fail on Body security
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 0.031% fail on Towbars
    • 0.031% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages