Peugeot 306 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
50.7% pass rate
from 2,003 tests in 2017
(8.3% worse than other 1997 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (64% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Parking brake performance (87% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear wheels (80% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Front wheels (73% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance (93% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (35% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Components (34% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes
        • 2.2% fail on Valves (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.25% fail on Cylinders (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Servos (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.050% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.050% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.35% fail on ABS (73% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.25% fail on Cable
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage
    • 0.100% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.100% fail on Pedal
        • 0.050% fail on Condition
        • 0.050% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.050% fail on Restricted movement
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators (73% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type (73% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Individual lamps (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.35% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (36% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.050% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (39% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.100% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.050% fail on Switch
    • 0.60% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.050% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.050% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms (44% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (52% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment
    • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Subframe mounting (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Component mounting (78% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Rear
      • 1.3% fail on Front
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (42% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts (42% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (41% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.050% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Location
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.75% fail on Sub-frames (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (72% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on General condition (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 0.050% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.050% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.050% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 0.050% fail on Axles
      • 0.050% fail on Axle beam
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (40% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Emissions (44% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (40% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.00% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on System
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (44% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.100% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.050% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres (29% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.050% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (42% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (53% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (36% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Steering system (40% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end (93% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.050% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.050% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.050% fail on Drive system
      • 0.050% fail on Pump
      • 0.050% fail on Rams
      • 0.050% fail on Other components
    • 0.20% fail on Steering control
      • 0.15% fail on Steering column
      • 0.050% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.100% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (45% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Body condition (64% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Vehicle structure (46% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis (46% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.45% fail on Seats
      • 0.45% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.050% fail on Body security
    • 0.050% fail on Load security
      • 0.050% fail on Access panel
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on Condition
  • 0.100% fail on Towbars
    • 0.050% fail on Towbar
    • 0.050% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages