Peugeot 306 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
50.6% pass rate
from 332 tests in 2017
(20% worse than other 1994 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Rear wheels (200% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels (91% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.0% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes
        • 3.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.60% fail on Valves
      • 0.60% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 0.90% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.90% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Condition
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.30% fail on Cable
  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Position lamps (89% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Direction indicators (88% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Flashing type (88% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Tell tales
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Suspension (32% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage condition
    • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.9% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting (65% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 2.1% fail on Rear (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.60% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.60% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.30% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.9% fail on Emissions
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.90% fail on System
      • 0.60% fail on Cap
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.90% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres (70% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.9% fail on Steering system
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Free play
        • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.90% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.60% fail on Steering control
      • 0.60% fail on Steering wheel (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (58% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.90% fail on Chassis
    • 0.90% fail on Body condition
    • 0.30% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Drivers
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages