Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
82.2% pass rate
from 6,604 tests in 2020
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (47% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp (24% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Individual direction indicators (26% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (80% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (14% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Size/type (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (24% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (25% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Brake performance (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (31% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake imbalance (57% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (36% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Brake performance not tested (20% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (25% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Rbt (sp) (19% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake imbalance (15% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4.1% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (33% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Electronic braking system (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Anti-lock braking system (16% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Parking brake control (40% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic systems (48% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.015% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.030% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 2.0% fail on Suspension (55% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (71% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (71% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (71% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Macpherson strut (41 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (0.084% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms (19% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (30% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes (52% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2.6% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Linkage ball joints (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (95% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.076% fail on Other suspension component (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.030% fail on Wheel bearings (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.015% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.015% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.015% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.015% fail on Suspension unit
  • 1.1% fail on Visibility (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Washers (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Wipers (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Driver's view (14% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on View to rear (15% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Mirrors (17% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.015% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.015% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.061% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Exhaust system (26% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Fuel system (37% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Pipe (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.030% fail on Bumpers (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Body (5.9% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Panel
      • 0.015% fail on Other body component
    • 0.030% fail on Doors (10% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Towbar
      • 0.015% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.015% fail on Load security
      • 0.015% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.015% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.015% fail on Undertray
  • 0.62% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (4.5% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Exhaust emissions (1.4% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition (25% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8.0% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.076% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.26% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (6.3% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates (37% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.091% fail on Road Wheels (41% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Attachment (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Condition
  • 0.076% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Steering gear (71% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Steering rack (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Steering linkage components (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Power steering
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
      • 0.015% fail on Pipes and hoses
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages