MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 3008 » 2016

Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
78.5% pass rate
from 6,714 tests in 2021
(31% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (94% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.015% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.015% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.015% fail on Horn
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (19% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (54% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.074% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.045% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.089% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.060% fail on Rbt
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.015% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.045% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.074% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.074% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.045% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (90% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Springs (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Coil spring (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.18% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.074% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.060% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.015% fail on Joints
    • 0.37% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.030% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.015% fail on Hose
      • 0.015% fail on Pipe
    • 0.045% fail on Body
      • 0.030% fail on Other body component
      • 0.015% fail on Panel
    • 0.030% fail on Seats
      • 0.015% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.015% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.015% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.015% fail on Doors
      • 0.015% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.015% fail on Hinge
  • 1.6% fail on Visibility (59% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Wipers (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.045% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.030% fail on View to rear
      • 0.030% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.015% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.95% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.69% fail on Compression ignition (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.030% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.015% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.015% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.089% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.089% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Noise suppression (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Undertray (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.43% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.089% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.089% fail on Attachment
  • 0.074% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
        • 0.015% fail on Steering component
    • 0.015% fail on Power steering
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
    • 0.015% fail on Steering column
  • 0.015% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.015% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages