Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.2% pass rate
from 7,119 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.028% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.070% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.014% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.014% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 0.014% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.014% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.014% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.014% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (58% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (25% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Size/type
    • 0.042% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (74% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.94% fail on Brake discs and drums (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.028% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.028% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.056% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.014% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.028% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.028% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.014% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.014% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.3% fail on Visibility (56% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Wipers (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.056% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.056% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.2% fail on Suspension (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Macpherson strut (38 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint (138 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Springs
      • 0.25% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.25% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.084% fail on Other suspension component (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (92 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.056% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.028% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension unit (48 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.39% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
    • 0.056% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.37% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.28% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.014% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.014% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.084% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.028% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.17% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
        • 0.014% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.070% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.028% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.014% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.014% fail on Body
      • 0.014% fail on Other body component
    • 0.014% fail on Doors
      • 0.014% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
  • 0.11% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.084% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.070% fail on Attachment
    • 0.014% fail on Condition
  • 0.028% fail on Steering
    • 0.014% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.014% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.014% fail on Steering play
      • 0.014% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages