MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 3008 » 2012

Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
76.7% pass rate
from 10,443 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (21% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.019% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.0096% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.019% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (36% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.0096% fail on Switch
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp (54% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp (59% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Individual lamps (95% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.029% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.019% fail on Battery
    • 0.019% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.0096% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.0096% fail on Horn
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth (91% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
    • 0.048% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (74% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (76% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Hub components (86% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (89% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake linings (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (52% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.38% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.077% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Electronic parking brake (28 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems (63% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Components (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.029% fail on Pipes
      • 0.029% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0096% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.0096% fail on Condition
    • 0.077% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.067% fail on ABS
    • 0.038% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.019% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Operation
      • 0.0096% fail on Components
        • 0.0096% fail on Servos
    • 0.0096% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.0096% fail on Cable
  • 2.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (38% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.99% fail on Wipers (66% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0096% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.1% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Coil springs (54% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Location
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (44% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.27% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.27% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.019% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.019% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.077% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0096% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Front suspension joints (81% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.15% fail on Front
    • 0.067% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 0.038% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0096% fail on Condition
    • 0.019% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.0096% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.0096% fail on Pipes
    • 0.0096% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.0096% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Installation check (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Anchorage's (41 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0096% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.29% fail on Steering
    • 0.22% fail on Steering system
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end (51% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0096% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.048% fail on Power steering
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
      • 0.0096% fail on Rams
      • 0.0096% fail on Other components
    • 0.019% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.0096% fail on Steering control
      • 0.0096% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.25% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0096% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.057% fail on Body condition
    • 0.029% fail on Doors
      • 0.019% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.019% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.019% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0096% fail on Passengers
    • 0.0096% fail on Body security
    • 0.0096% fail on Load security
      • 0.0096% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.096% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (85% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.019% fail on Emissions (85% better than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages