MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 3008 » 2010

Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
53.0% pass rate
from 10,550 tests in 2021
(30% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0095% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.0095% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.038% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.038% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.085% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 16% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Springs (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Coil springs (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Coil spring (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Mounting
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension arm (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (29% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Linkage (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0095% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0095% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.057% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes (51 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.0095% fail on Other components
    • 0.057% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0095% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0095% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0095% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0095% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
        • 0.0095% fail on Lever
        • 0.0095% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0095% fail on Pivot
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.95% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0095% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0095% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0095% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (39% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0095% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (59% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0095% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0095% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.98% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Lever
    • 0.89% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Anti-lock braking system (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Electronic braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0095% fail on Servos
    • 0.085% fail on Rigid brake pipes (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.095% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Intermediate drop arm (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.019% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0095% fail on Other components
        • 0.0095% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Other components
      • 0.028% fail on Pump (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Steering gear (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Steering rack (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Steering wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Steering play
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.028% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.019% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0095% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.0095% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.0095% fail on Steering column
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.019% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
      • 0.0095% fail on Belts
    • 0.68% fail on Exhaust system (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.085% fail on Other body component
      • 0.038% fail on Panel
    • 0.085% fail on Fuel system (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Tank
      • 0.0095% fail on Hose
      • 0.0095% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0095% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0095% fail on System
    • 0.057% fail on Undertray
    • 0.038% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.028% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0095% fail on Bracket
    • 0.038% fail on Doors (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.019% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0095% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0095% fail on Hinge
      • 0.0095% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0095% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0095% fail on Catch
    • 0.038% fail on Seats
      • 0.028% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0095% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.028% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.0095% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0095% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0095% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0095% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0095% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0095% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0095% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0095% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.019% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.019% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0095% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0095% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.78% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.019% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.019% fail on Oxygen sensor (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.0095% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0095% fail on Undertray
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.028% fail on Requirements
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0095% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0095% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0095% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages