MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 3008 » 2010

Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.1% pass rate
from 11,545 tests in 2020
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10.0% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.017% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0087% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Position lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.017% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0087% fail on Switch
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on All direction indicators (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Electrical equipment (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0087% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.043% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.026% fail on Daytime running lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.0087% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.0087% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0087% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Springs (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Coil springs (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Coil spring (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.0087% fail on Torsion bar
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (14% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.00% fail on Pins and bushes (22% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.017% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Linkage (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0087% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0087% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.28% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.061% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Pipes (44 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.035% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.026% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0087% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
  • 10.0% fail on Brakes (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.061% fail on Cable
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.0087% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (35% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance (44% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0087% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.36% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0087% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (51% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.069% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.026% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Electronic parking brake (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Lever (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Electronic braking system (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Hand lever (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.026% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.069% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0087% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.035% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0087% fail on Servos
    • 0.0087% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.0087% fail on Operation
    • 0.0087% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0087% fail on Other components
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.0087% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 5.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Exhaust system (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.095% fail on Other body component
      • 0.035% fail on Panel
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.061% fail on System
      • 0.035% fail on Pipe
      • 0.017% fail on Tank
      • 0.0087% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.078% fail on Undertray
    • 0.061% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.043% fail on Doors (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0087% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0087% fail on Catch
        • 0.0087% fail on Hinge
      • 0.017% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0087% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0087% fail on Catch
    • 0.035% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.017% fail on Bracket
    • 0.035% fail on Seats
      • 0.026% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0087% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0087% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0087% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0087% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0087% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.0087% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0087% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0087% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.078% fail on Power steering
      • 0.052% fail on Operation
      • 0.017% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0087% fail on Other components
    • 0.069% fail on Steering wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Steering gear (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Steering rack (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Steering play
      • 0.017% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0087% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0087% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.026% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0087% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0087% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.0087% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.0087% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.57% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0087% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.026% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.026% fail on Undertray
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0087% fail on Requirements
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Airbags
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0087% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.026% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.017% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0087% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0087% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages