Peugeot 3008 MOT Results
Registered in 201061.9% pass rate
from 10,194 tests in 2017
(31% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(79% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Front lamps (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on All position lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
(71% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.0098% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.020% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.0098% fail on Matched pair
-
0.59% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(62% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Fog lamp (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Direction indicators
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Individual lamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.020% fail on All direction indicators (87% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.069% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.049% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0098% fail on Battery
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
(37% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Location
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
-
2.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Wheel bearings
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Rear
-
0.89% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.049% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.0098% fail on Condition
-
0.73% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
- 0.0098% fail on Condition
- 0.47% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.19% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.19% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Shock absorbers
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.020% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.020% fail on Pipes (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on General condition
-
0.0098% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.0098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.0098% fail on
Axles
- 0.0098% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
(37% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Brakes
(45% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
(72% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Brake pads (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Brake discs (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Front wheels
- 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.059% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.039% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake
(63% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Electronic parking brake (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Condition
-
0.48% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.47% fail on
Components
- 0.38% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.020% fail on Leaks
-
0.47% fail on
Components
- 0.27% fail on ABS
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.0098% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.059% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.049% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.039% fail on Cable
- 0.0098% fail on Pivot
-
0.0098% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.0098% fail on
Components
- 0.0098% fail on Hoses
-
0.0098% fail on
Components
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
(72% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
(19% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Tread depth (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Size/type
- 0.069% fail on Valve stem
- 0.059% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
4.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.2% fail on Washers (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
-
2.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Attachment
-
0.0098% fail on
Installation check
- 0.0098% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.0% fail on
Steering system
- 0.93% fail on Track rod end (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Ball joint
- 0.039% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Power steering
- 0.059% fail on Operation
- 0.020% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.0098% fail on Pump
- 0.0098% fail on Other components
-
0.029% fail on
Steering control
- 0.029% fail on Steering column (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Steering operation
-
1.0% fail on
Steering system
-
0.84% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Emissions
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on System (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Tank
- 0.0098% fail on Pipe
- 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.26% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Attachment
-
0.25% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Registration plate (44% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Body condition
-
0.029% fail on
Seats
- 0.029% fail on Drivers
-
0.020% fail on
Doors
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Passengers other
-
0.0098% fail on
Load security
- 0.0098% fail on Bootlid
-
0.029% fail on
Towbars
(10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 3008 (2009 - 2017)
Spacious and practical interior, excellent diesel engines, clever split tailgate and boot.