MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 3008 » 2010

Peugeot 3008 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.9% pass rate
from 10,194 tests in 2017
(31% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Position lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on All position lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.0098% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.0098% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Fog lamp (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on All direction indicators (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.069% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.049% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.0098% fail on Battery
  • 8.8% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Location
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Rear
    • 0.89% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.0098% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0098% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.020% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.020% fail on Pipes (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0098% fail on General condition
    • 0.0098% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.0098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0098% fail on Axles
      • 0.0098% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 8.1% fail on Brakes (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Hub components (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.059% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.039% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Electronic parking brake (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0098% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Components
        • 0.38% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Leaks
    • 0.27% fail on ABS
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.0098% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.059% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.049% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.039% fail on Cable
      • 0.0098% fail on Pivot
    • 0.0098% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0098% fail on Components
        • 0.0098% fail on Hoses
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres (19% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Size/type
    • 0.069% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.059% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 4.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0098% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0098% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0098% fail on Installation check
        • 0.0098% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering system
      • 0.93% fail on Track rod end (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.039% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
      • 0.020% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.0098% fail on Pump
      • 0.0098% fail on Other components
    • 0.029% fail on Steering control
      • 0.029% fail on Steering column (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.84% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on System (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Tank
      • 0.0098% fail on Pipe
    • 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Registration plates and VIN (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate (44% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Body condition
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.029% fail on Drivers
    • 0.020% fail on Doors (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.0098% fail on Load security
      • 0.0098% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.029% fail on Towbars (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages