Peugeot 3008 MOT Results
Registered in 200948.0% pass rate
from 981 tests in 2021
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 3008 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(67% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
(51% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.71% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.31% fail on Position lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
7.2% fail on
Springs
-
7.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 7.2% fail on Coil spring
- 0.10% fail on Mounting
-
7.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.31% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.10% fail on
Axles
- 0.10% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.10% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.10% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.10% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.10% fail on Pipes
-
7.2% fail on
Springs
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Brake performance
(42% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
0.61% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.61% fail on
Rbt
- 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.61% fail on
Rbt
- 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Brake pads (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.10% fail on Cable
-
4.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Electronic parking brake (40 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.61% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Electronic braking system (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.41% fail on Pedal
- 0.10% fail on Hand lever
-
0.31% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
6.6% fail on
Brake performance
(42% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(98% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(98% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
9.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(41% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Tread depth (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
7.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(54% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.10% fail on Joints
-
5.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.31% fail on
Doors
-
0.10% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.10% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.10% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.10% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.10% fail on Undertray
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
-
0.20% fail on
Steering play
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
-
0.10% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.10% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.10% fail on Steering column
-
6.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Washers
- 2.1% fail on Wipers
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Requirements
- 0.10% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Airbags
- 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.51% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.10% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 3008 (2009 - 2017)
Spacious and practical interior, excellent diesel engines, clever split tailgate and boot.