MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 207 » 2010

Peugeot 207 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.2% pass rate
from 33,830 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 207 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Springs (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Coil springs (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Coil spring (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover (28% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Suspension arm (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.071% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0030% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.095% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.092% fail on Sub-frames (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Sub-frame (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0059% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0030% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.050% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0089% fail on Axles (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0059% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0030% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0089% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.0030% fail on Matched pair
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (24% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (24% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on Side repeaters (44% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on All direction indicators (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0059% fail on Switch
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0030% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical equipment (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.062% fail on Battery(ies) (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0030% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.083% fail on Reversing lamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Reversing lamps (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Hazard warning (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Switch (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0089% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0089% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.0059% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.0030% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Transmission (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Flexible couplings (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0030% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.28% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Belts
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Engine mounting condition (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Bracket (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Doors (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Hinge (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.015% fail on Door condition (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Hinge (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0030% fail on Catch
      • 0.030% fail on Other passenger's door (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Door condition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Hinge (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.089% fail on Body
      • 0.068% fail on Other body component
      • 0.015% fail on Panel
      • 0.0059% fail on Body condition
    • 0.089% fail on Seats
      • 0.044% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.044% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.068% fail on Fuel system (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Tank
      • 0.015% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0089% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.044% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0030% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0030% fail on Strengthening plate
      • 0.0030% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.024% fail on Chassis
      • 0.021% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.0030% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.018% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.018% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.012% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0059% fail on Cabs
      • 0.0059% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.0059% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.0030% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0030% fail on Other towbar components
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0030% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0089% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.012% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.0089% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (56% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.053% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0089% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0089% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0030% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0089% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0089% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0030% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0059% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.092% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Cable
        • 0.035% fail on Lever
        • 0.0059% fail on Rod (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0030% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0030% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake control (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0030% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0059% fail on Electronic braking system
      • 0.0030% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.065% fail on Rigid brake pipes (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.035% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.024% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.035% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0089% fail on Other components
      • 0.0030% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.0030% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.0030% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0030% fail on Servos
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.056% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.056% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.033% fail on Bonnet (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0030% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.87% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.050% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.030% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.012% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0059% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.0030% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.0030% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.0030% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
    • 0.46% fail on Fluid leaks (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0030% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.012% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0059% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.0059% fail on Undertray
  • 5.0% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0089% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0059% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0059% fail on Other components
        • 0.0030% fail on Steering component
        • 0.0030% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.0059% fail on Lock stop (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0030% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Operation (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Power steering
      • 0.089% fail on Operation (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0030% fail on Rams
      • 0.0030% fail on Other components
    • 0.059% fail on Electronic power steering (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Steering play
      • 0.050% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.018% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0089% fail on Steering column
  • 0.66% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.065% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0059% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0030% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Airbags
      • 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0059% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.012% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0059% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0059% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.0030% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.0030% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages