Peugeot 206 MOT Results
Registered in 200958.1% pass rate
from 939 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
9.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.85% fail on
Springs
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.32% fail on Other suspension component (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Axles
- 0.11% fail on Axle
- 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.21% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
9.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.53% fail on
Direction indicators
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
0.53% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.32% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tank (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Bumpers
-
0.43% fail on
Spare wheel
(56 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Spare wheel condition (43 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Carrier (69 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.21% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.11% fail on Catch
- 0.11% fail on Hinge
-
0.21% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.11% fail on
Chassis
- 0.11% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.11% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Other body component
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
-
5.3% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering gear
(9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Steering rack (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Operation (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.53% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Steering arm
-
0.53% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.21% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.43% fail on
Steering play
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering gear
(9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
4.8% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.75% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.75% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.0% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt
-
0.21% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.43% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.32% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.11% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.64% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
3.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.43% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.96% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
0.11% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.11% fail on Registration plates