MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 206 » 2009

Peugeot 206 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.6% pass rate
from 1,081 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.093% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Switch
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.93% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Battery
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.093% fail on Individual lamps
  • 9.5% fail on Suspension
    • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Drive shafts (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.93% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.56% fail on Rear
    • 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.093% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.093% fail on Axles
      • 0.093% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.093% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Emissions
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.093% fail on Tank
      • 0.093% fail on Cap
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.19% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.65% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.37% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Components
        • 0.19% fail on Pipes
    • 0.19% fail on ABS
    • 0.093% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.093% fail on Pedal
        • 0.093% fail on Condition
    • 0.093% fail on Restricted movement
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.46% fail on Steering arm (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Drag link end (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Free play (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Other components
        • 0.093% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Rams
      • 0.093% fail on Other components
  • 3.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.65% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.56% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.093% fail on Requirements
      • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.093% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.093% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.37% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.28% fail on Body condition
    • 0.093% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.37% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages