Peugeot 206 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.4% pass rate
from 19,132 tests in 2021
(8.0% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.3% fail on Suspension arms (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (53% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring (54% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Torsion bars (31 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Torsion bar (36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Bonded suspension units
        • 0.0052% fail on Bonded suspension unit
      • 0.0052% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Stub axle (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Swivel joints/housing (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers (45% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.099% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.063% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.042% fail on Sub-frame (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.089% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0052% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.016% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (8.5% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators (54% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on All direction indicators (53% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0052% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0052% fail on Switch
    • 0.057% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 0.037% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.031% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.0052% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.010% fail on Rear reflectors (85% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 12% fail on Brakes (7.6% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (20% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (27% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (22% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (96% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (21% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (21% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.057% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.0052% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0052% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0052% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt (48% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.089% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0052% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Brake drums (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Cable (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Lever
        • 0.0052% fail on Linkage
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.094% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Master cylinder (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Other braking system component (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Other components
      • 0.0052% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.010% fail on Servos
      • 0.010% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Leaks
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (36% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Joints (36% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.010% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.0052% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.063% fail on Prop shafts (68% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Joints (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Belts
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pipe
      • 0.016% fail on Hose
      • 0.0052% fail on System
    • 0.40% fail on Seats (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's seat (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.31% fail on Integral vehicle structure (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0052% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.30% fail on Spare wheel (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Carrier (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Doors (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Other passenger's door (59% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Door condition (65% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Catch
        • 0.0052% fail on Hinge
      • 0.089% fail on Front passenger's door (49% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition (54% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Hinge (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Driver's door (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Catch
        • 0.016% fail on Hinge
        • 0.010% fail on Door condition (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
      • 0.089% fail on Panel
      • 0.016% fail on Body condition
    • 0.18% fail on Chassis (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Chassis condition (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.078% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.073% fail on Boot lid condition (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.073% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.057% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.016% fail on Bracket
    • 0.026% fail on Undertray
    • 0.010% fail on Cabs
      • 0.010% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.010% fail on Passenger compartment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.0052% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0052% fail on Other towbar components
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers (13% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0052% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0052% fail on Window
    • 0.042% fail on Bonnet (80% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.0052% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Spark ignition (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (19% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0052% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0052% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.57% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.037% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.0052% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.031% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.016% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.75% fail on Fluid leaks (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Engine oil leaks (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.026% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.021% fail on Undertray
      • 0.0052% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Steering (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end (14% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.021% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.010% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0052% fail on Other components
        • 0.0052% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
    • 0.61% fail on Power steering (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other components (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Rams
      • 0.016% fail on Pump
    • 0.14% fail on Steering play
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0052% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.0052% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Seat belts (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0052% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0052% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.052% fail on Airbags
      • 0.047% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0052% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.48% fail on Identification of the vehicle (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plates (27% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Condition
  • 0.016% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.016% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.016% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.016% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages