Peugeot 206 MOT Results
Registered in 200550.8% pass rate
from 40,831 tests in 2017
(9.2% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(33% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.9% fail on Headlamp aim (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Position lamps
(34% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Front lamps (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Rear lamps (36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.049% fail on All position lamps
- 0.0049% fail on Switch
-
5.6% fail on
Headlamps
(30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Headlamp (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Switch
-
0.012% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.0024% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.012% fail on Matched pair
-
0.0098% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0073% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.0024% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.0098% fail on Dipswitch
-
4.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Switch
- 0.015% fail on Tell tale (73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Individual lamps (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on All direction indicators (64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Battery (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.024% fail on
Hazard warning
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Lamp
- 0.0098% fail on Switch (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0024% fail on Tell tale
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0049% fail on Trailer electrical socket (82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(2.9% better than other 2005 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Linkage condition (67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Attachment (77% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Attachment (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(39% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Front (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Couplings
- 0.0024% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.012% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0024% fail on Universal joint
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Location (47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(13% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (13% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Radius arms
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0049% fail on Attachment
-
0.33% fail on
Axles
(8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Axle beam (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Swivel joints/housing (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Stub axle (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0073% fail on Clearance (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Prescribed areas
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Component mounting (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Subframe mounting (74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.30% fail on
Trailing arms
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0073% fail on Condition
- 0.0049% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.015% fail on Condition
- 0.0024% fail on Attachment
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
(27% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0073% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0024% fail on Attachment
-
0.054% fail on
Sub-frames
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.017% fail on Attachment
-
0.049% fail on
Torsion bars
(12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0024% fail on Condition
- 0.020% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.015% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.012% fail on Condition
- 0.0024% fail on Attachment
- 0.012% fail on General condition
-
0.0073% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.0073% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.0073% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.0073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(13% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
(14% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (27% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Rear wheels (21% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels
- 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Brake operation
-
3.4% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Wheel cylinder (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Brake calipers (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Brake drums
-
2.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Components
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pipes (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Hoses (27% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Cylinders (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.017% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0049% fail on Servos
- 0.37% fail on Leaks (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Operation (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (64% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Components
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on ABS (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Condition (19% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0049% fail on Fitment
-
0.23% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.22% fail on Cable
- 0.0049% fail on Lever
- 0.16% fail on Restricted movement (41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.14% fail on
Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Anti-slip (67% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Pedal
-
0.096% fail on
Prescribed areas
(8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0024% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.088% fail on Electronic stability system (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0073% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.0073% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(78% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.0073% fail on
Components
- 0.0049% fail on Servos
- 0.0024% fail on Hoses
-
0.0073% fail on
Components
- 0.0049% fail on Locking devices
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
(14% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(90% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Emissions (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tank (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on System
- 0.054% fail on Cap (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Pipe (60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Hose
- 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(16% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Washers (18% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Windscreen
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors (36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Bonnet (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0024% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
8.7% fail on
Tyres
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Size/type (31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Valve stem (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Steering
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Steering system
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Track rod end
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Free play
(41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Steering rack (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Steering arm
- 0.081% fail on Drag link end
-
0.027% fail on
Other components
- 0.020% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.0073% fail on Steering component
- 0.0024% fail on Steering box
-
0.50% fail on
Power steering
(41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Other components (89% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Operation (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Drive system (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Pump
- 0.017% fail on Rams
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.0098% fail on
Steering control
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0073% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.0024% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.0024% fail on Universal joint
- 0.0024% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.6% fail on
Steering system
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(8.1% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(36% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Passengers airbag (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Seat belts
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (20% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Requirements
- 0.034% fail on Attachment
-
0.0024% fail on
Installation check
- 0.0024% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
1.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(36% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.42% fail on Body condition
-
0.38% fail on
Seats
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Drivers (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Passengers
- 0.21% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Passengers other (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Drivers (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Passengers front (77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.054% fail on
Vehicle structure
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Chassis (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Body security
-
0.037% fail on
Load security
- 0.017% fail on Bootlid
- 0.012% fail on Tailgate
- 0.0073% fail on Access panel
-
0.55% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Registration plate (29% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.0024% fail on Hubs
-
0.0024% fail on
Towbars
- 0.0024% fail on Vehicle structure