MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 206 » 2000

Peugeot 206 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.2% pass rate
from 2,863 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (27% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.84% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.38% fail on Horn
      • 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.31% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.070% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.035% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.070% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 20% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 19% fail on Spark ignition (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 16% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.10% fail on Oxygen sensor (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.035% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.73% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.38% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.035% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.035% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.035% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.035% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 18% fail on Suspension (17% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
      • 0.070% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.38% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Axles
      • 0.17% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Swivel joints/housing (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Axle
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.070% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 17% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Brake performance (19% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.035% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.035% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.035% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.035% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Load sensing valves (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.035% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.035% fail on Cable
    • 0.59% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Anti-lock braking system (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.45% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.38% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.31% fail on Valves (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.035% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.035% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.035% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.035% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.070% fail on Servos
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.94% fail on Fuel system (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.66% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.45% fail on Chassis (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Chassis condition (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
      • 0.070% fail on Body condition
      • 0.035% fail on Other body component
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Carrier (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Spare wheel condition (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.14% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.070% fail on Cabs
      • 0.070% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.035% fail on Doors
      • 0.035% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.035% fail on Door condition
  • 11% fail on Visibility (46% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.070% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.070% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (25% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment
      • 0.070% fail on Requirements
    • 0.52% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (32% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
        • 0.035% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.035% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Operation
      • 0.035% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.070% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages