Peugeot 206 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.1% pass rate
from 6,071 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Position lamp (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.049% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps (23% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp (19% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (31% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (31% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (29% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.033% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.082% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.049% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.049% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 0.033% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 21% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 20% fail on Spark ignition (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 17% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (55% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.082% fail on Oxygen sensor (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.049% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.016% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.016% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.099% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.033% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.016% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.016% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.033% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.066% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.066% fail on Sound deadening material (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 21% fail on Suspension (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.6% fail on Suspension arms (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (31% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (61% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.63% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.59% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Mounting
      • 0.033% fail on Torsion bars (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Torsion bar
        • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.16% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.066% fail on Axle
      • 0.066% fail on Stub axle (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 19% fail on Brakes (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance (17% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.033% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Load sensing valves (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.082% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.15% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.066% fail on Cable
        • 0.049% fail on Lever
        • 0.033% fail on Linkage
    • 0.81% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pedal (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.77% fail on Flexible brake hoses (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.71% fail on Lever
    • 0.71% fail on Hydraulic systems (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Valves (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.033% fail on Servos
      • 0.033% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.38% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.38% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Electronic stability control (76% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.099% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.082% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.016% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.016% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.016% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.049% fail on Servos
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
      • 0.016% fail on Leaks
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Transmission (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.016% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.33% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.33% fail on Joints
      • 0.016% fail on Belts
    • 0.92% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.87% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (29% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Strengthening plate (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.84% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on System
      • 0.016% fail on Pipe
    • 0.66% fail on Chassis (41% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis condition (40% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Seats (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Body
      • 0.28% fail on Panel
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component
      • 0.033% fail on Body condition
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Carrier (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel condition (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.049% fail on Hinge
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
        • 0.016% fail on Catch
      • 0.033% fail on Other passenger's door (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
    • 0.099% fail on Floor
    • 0.082% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.066% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.016% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.033% fail on Cabs
      • 0.033% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.016% fail on Towbar
      • 0.016% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 11% fail on Visibility (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Washers (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on View to rear (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Mirrors (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (33% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (30% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (20% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.066% fail on Requirements
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 0.82% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Airbags
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components (25% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.016% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.58% fail on Steering gear (42% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.082% fail on Other components
      • 0.049% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.016% fail on Steering play
      • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.97% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.016% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.066% fail on Condition
  • 0.082% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.082% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.016% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.016% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages