Peugeot 206 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
41.6% pass rate
from 2,721 tests in 2020
(31% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10.0% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.074% fail on Switch
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.037% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.44% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
      • 0.037% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.037% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.037% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 26% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 26% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 25% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 22% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Non catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.11% fail on Oxygen sensor (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.074% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.074% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.037% fail on Other emission control equipment
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 21% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (71% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (45% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (22% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Springs (72% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Coil springs (75% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Coil spring (75% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers (50% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.18% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Axle (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.037% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 20% fail on Brakes (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (28% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.074% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.037% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.037% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Load sensing valves (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.074% fail on Lever
        • 0.037% fail on Cable
    • 0.96% fail on Parking brake control (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Lever (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (77% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
    • 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.48% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.33% fail on Valves (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.037% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.037% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.074% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.074% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.037% fail on Additional braking device
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.29% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.29% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.77% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on System
      • 0.037% fail on Pipe
      • 0.037% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.62% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Carrier (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Spare wheel condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
      • 0.074% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.074% fail on Door condition
      • 0.037% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.037% fail on Door condition
    • 0.37% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Boot lid condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Body
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
      • 0.074% fail on Panel
      • 0.037% fail on Body condition
      • 0.037% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.074% fail on Floor
  • 12% fail on Visibility (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers (34% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.037% fail on Window
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth (28% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (26% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (48% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack (77% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.074% fail on Operation
      • 0.074% fail on Other components
      • 0.037% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.037% fail on Steering play
      • 0.037% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.62% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.037% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.037% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages