Peugeot 206 MOT Results
Registered in 199938.3% pass rate
from 5,303 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.
-
38% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Position lamps
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Front lamps (80% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.19% fail on All position lamps (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (90% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Individual lamps (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.66% fail on All direction indicators (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Tell tales
-
9.4% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.057% fail on Switch
-
0.019% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.019% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.019% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.8% fail on Battery (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.057% fail on Tell tale
- 0.45% fail on Horn
-
0.26% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.15% fail on Lamp
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.094% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
-
14% fail on
Position lamps
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
30% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 23% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
(56% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on System
- 0.075% fail on Cap (78% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Pipe
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(99% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage condition (76% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Condition
-
9.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.057% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Attachment
-
3.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(36% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Component mounting (41% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.13% fail on Spring mounting (67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Rear
- 0.96% fail on Front
-
0.94% fail on
Shock absorbers
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Condition (40% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Radius arms
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.58% fail on Condition
-
0.57% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Condition (82% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Location
-
0.21% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.17% fail on
Trailing arms
(63% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Axles
- 0.075% fail on Axle beam
- 0.057% fail on Stub axle (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.075% fail on
Torsion bars
(23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Attachment (38 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Sub-frames
(92% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Condition
- 0.019% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
-
0.019% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.019% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.019% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.019% fail on Condition
-
0.019% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.019% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.019% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(99% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(34% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Valves (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Hoses (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pipes (18% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Cylinders (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.68% fail on Leaks
- 0.34% fail on Operation (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
13% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(21% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Rear wheels (33% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance (18% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Front wheels (60% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.038% fail on Brake operation
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.83% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Wheel cylinder (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.038% fail on Brake drums
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on ABS (73% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.30% fail on
Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.30% fail on
Pedal
- 0.094% fail on Restricted movement (67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.075% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.075% fail on Cable
-
0.075% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.057% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.019% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.057% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.057% fail on
Components
- 0.038% fail on Servos
- 0.019% fail on Valves
-
0.057% fail on
Components
- 0.019% fail on Additional braking devices
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(40% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Washers (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Windscreen
- 0.36% fail on Mirrors
- 0.094% fail on Bonnet
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(24% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Size/type
- 0.13% fail on Valve stem
-
4.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 0.038% fail on Attachment
-
0.70% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(60% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.64% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (60% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.4% fail on Body condition (33% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Seats
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Drivers
-
0.72% fail on
Vehicle structure
(39% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Chassis (39% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Doors
- 0.34% fail on Passengers other
- 0.094% fail on Drivers
- 0.038% fail on Passengers front
- 0.23% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Load security
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Bootlid
- 0.075% fail on Tailgate (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Body security
- 0.057% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.057% fail on Speedometer
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
(36% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
(42% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end (28% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Steering rack (75% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Drag link end
- 0.019% fail on Steering arm
-
0.019% fail on
Other components
- 0.019% fail on Steering component
- 0.43% fail on Steering operation (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Power steering
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.094% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.075% fail on Other components
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
(42% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.019% fail on
Towbars
- 0.019% fail on Vehicle structure