Peugeot 206 MOT Results
Registered in 199837.0% pass rate
from 665 tests in 2017
(34% worse than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 206 is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(67% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Position lamps
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(90% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(90% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Individual lamps (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.30% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(90% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp
- 1.7% fail on Battery
-
0.90% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.90% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Horn
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
14% fail on
Position lamps
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
32% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(200% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 25% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.75% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.45% fail on System
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(48% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Couplings
-
0.45% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.15% fail on Universal joint
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Linkage condition
-
8.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(130% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(66% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.15% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.90% fail on Front
- 0.90% fail on Rear
-
1.1% fail on
Radius arms
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.75% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.75% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Coil springs
(71% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Condition (77% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Location
- 0.30% fail on General condition (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(53% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Components
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Valves (18 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Pipes
- 5.0% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Leaks
- 0.15% fail on Operation
-
15% fail on
Components
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Parking brake performance (67% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Rear wheels (62% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Front wheels (67% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.45% fail on Brake discs
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.45% fail on
Pedal
- 0.45% fail on Condition
-
0.45% fail on
Pedal
- 0.30% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.30% fail on ABS (79% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.30% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (35 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(55% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Wipers (47% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Windscreen
- 0.45% fail on Mirrors
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(45% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Tread depth (60% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Size/type
- 0.15% fail on Valve stem
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.9% fail on
Steering system
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end (75% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
- 0.45% fail on Steering operation (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Power steering
- 0.30% fail on Other components
- 0.15% fail on Operation
-
0.15% fail on
Steering control
- 0.15% fail on Steering column
-
3.9% fail on
Steering system
-
3.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(40% better than other 1998 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.2% fail on Body condition
-
0.90% fail on
Seats
- 0.60% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Drivers
-
0.75% fail on
Doors
- 0.75% fail on Passengers other
- 0.15% fail on Speedometer
-
0.15% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.15% fail on Chassis
- 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.45% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Attachment