Peugeot 205 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
46.6% pass rate
from 380 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (45% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Headlamp aim (99% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.26% fail on Switch
      • 0.26% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.4% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.26% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.26% fail on Lamp
  • 25% fail on Brakes (70% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 12% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.79% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Components (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Pipes
        • 3.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.53% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.26% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.79% fail on Leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.53% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.53% fail on Cable
    • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 23% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Couplings
        • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 0.79% fail on Rear
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.53% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.53% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road (86% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on System
    • 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Passengers
    • 2.4% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
  • 6.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering system
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 0.79% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Rams
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
    • 0.79% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering control
      • 0.26% fail on Steering column
      • 0.26% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.26% fail on Universal joint
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.79% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages