Peugeot 205 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
51.0% pass rate
from 300 tests in 2020
(27% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (51% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Headlamps (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Dipswitch
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 18% fail on Brakes (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 7.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.33% fail on Cable
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.33% fail on Leaks
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.33% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.33% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.33% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.67% fail on Joints
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.67% fail on Hose
      • 0.33% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.67% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.67% fail on Door condition
      • 0.33% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.33% fail on Hinge
    • 0.67% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.33% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.33% fail on Carrier
    • 0.33% fail on Cabs
      • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.33% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.0% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.33% fail on Axle
  • 11% fail on Visibility (62% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.67% fail on View to rear
      • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.33% fail on Window
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.67% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Other leaks (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.67% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Speedometer (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages