Peugeot 205 MOT Results
Registered in 199458.3% pass rate
from 228 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(88% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(200% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.44% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
-
7.0% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.88% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs
-
0.44% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.44% fail on Brake pads
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.44% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.88% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.44% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Horn
- 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.44% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.44% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.44% fail on Position lamp
-
0.44% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.44% fail on Switch
-
0.44% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.44% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
6.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.88% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.44% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.88% fail on
Springs
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.88% fail on Coil spring
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.44% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.44% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
13% fail on
Visibility
(86% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.44% fail on Bonnet
-
0.44% fail on
View to rear
- 0.44% fail on Mirrors
-
9.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Joints
-
0.44% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.44% fail on Joints
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.8% fail on
Seats
- 1.8% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Passenger's seat
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.88% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.44% fail on Hose
- 0.44% fail on Pipe
-
0.44% fail on
Chassis
- 0.44% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.44% fail on Bumpers
-
0.44% fail on
Doors
-
0.44% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.44% fail on Door condition
-
0.44% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.44% fail on Floor
-
5.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.88% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.88% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
-
0.88% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.44% fail on Steering rack
-
0.44% fail on
Power steering
- 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.44% fail on
Steering play
- 0.44% fail on Steering rack
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.88% fail on Tread depth
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.88% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.44% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.44% fail on Speedometer