Peugeot 205 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
59.8% pass rate
from 585 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 4.6% fail on Electrical equipment (88% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Horn
      • 2.2% fail on Battery(ies) (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.17% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (77% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (84% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Cable (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.68% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.51% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
    • 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.0% fail on Transmission (91% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
      • 0.17% fail on Belts
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.17% fail on System
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.85% fail on Doors
      • 0.51% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.51% fail on Door condition
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.85% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.51% fail on Chassis
      • 0.51% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.34% fail on Spare wheel (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.17% fail on Carrier
    • 0.17% fail on Towbar
      • 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 11% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.34% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.34% fail on View to rear
      • 0.34% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms (91% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.51% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.51% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Axles
      • 0.34% fail on Axle (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Springs
      • 0.34% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.34% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.17% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.17% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.68% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.51% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
        • 0.17% fail on Steering component
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.51% fail on Operation
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Requirements
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
  • 0.17% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.17% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.17% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages