Peugeot 205 MOT Results
Registered in 199264.0% pass rate
from 508 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Switch
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.2% fail on Horn
- 0.59% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.39% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.39% fail on Switch
-
4.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(37% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 0.98% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.79% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.79% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.79% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
-
0.20% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.20% fail on Brake pads
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.20% fail on Cable
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.59% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.39% fail on Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.20% fail on Lever
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.20% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.20% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
(80% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.20% fail on Joints
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.79% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.59% fail on Pipe
- 0.20% fail on Hose
-
0.79% fail on
Doors
-
0.39% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.39% fail on Door condition
-
0.39% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.39% fail on Door condition
-
0.39% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.59% fail on
Chassis
- 0.59% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.59% fail on
Seats
- 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.20% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.20% fail on Carrier
-
0.20% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Panel
- 0.20% fail on Floor
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
(80% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 6.9% fail on Washers (90% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
7.7% fail on
Suspension
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.39% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.39% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Axles
- 0.20% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.20% fail on Mounting
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
-
6.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.98% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.59% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
-
3.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.59% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.79% fail on Track rod end
-
0.59% fail on
Power steering
- 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.20% fail on Pump
-
0.59% fail on
Steering play
- 0.59% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Steering column
-
1.8% fail on
Steering gear
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.98% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.98% fail on Registration plates
-
0.59% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.59% fail on Attachment