MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 205 » 1992

Peugeot 205 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
55.7% pass rate
from 650 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 1992 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (34% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.31% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.31% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Battery (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Horn (81% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.46% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (52% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear wheels (67% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 7.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (48% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Components (48% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes (64% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical components (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.46% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Couplings
      • 0.31% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.31% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.77% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.46% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.3% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.92% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.77% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 0.46% fail on Rear
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Location
    • 0.46% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.31% fail on General condition (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.15% fail on Axle beam
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (56% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.3% fail on Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.77% fail on Pipe
      • 0.77% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Hose
      • 0.31% fail on Cap
    • 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.3% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis
    • 0.62% fail on Seats
      • 0.46% fail on Drivers
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers
    • 0.31% fail on Speedometer
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.31% fail on Free play
        • 0.31% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Drive system
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.31% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.15% fail on Steering control
      • 0.15% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages