Peugeot 205 MOT Results
Registered in 199255.7% pass rate
from 650 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 1992 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(34% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.31% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.31% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.31% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.4% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.15% fail on All position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Switch
- 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.7% fail on Battery (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Switch
- 3.2% fail on Horn (81% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.46% fail on Switch
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(42% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(52% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Rear wheels (67% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.46% fail on Brake imbalance
-
7.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(48% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Components
(48% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Pipes (64% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.1% fail on Leaks
- 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.15% fail on Operation
-
6.6% fail on
Components
(48% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical components
(6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
- 0.77% fail on Brake discs
- 0.46% fail on Brake pads
- 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
- 1.2% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.62% fail on Condition
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(52% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Couplings
-
0.31% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.31% fail on Drive shafts
-
5.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting
- 0.77% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.46% fail on Spring mounting
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.92% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.77% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Front
- 0.46% fail on Rear
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.92% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Location
- 0.46% fail on Front suspension joints
- 0.31% fail on General condition (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Axles
- 0.15% fail on Axle beam
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(56% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.15% fail on Windscreen
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.3% fail on Emissions
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.77% fail on Pipe
- 0.77% fail on System
- 0.31% fail on Hose
- 0.31% fail on Cap
- 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.3% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Passengers other
- 1.4% fail on Body condition
-
0.62% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.62% fail on Chassis
-
0.62% fail on
Seats
- 0.46% fail on Drivers
- 0.15% fail on Passengers
- 0.31% fail on Speedometer
-
2.3% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
- 1.1% fail on Steering rack
-
0.31% fail on
Free play
- 0.31% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Steering arm
-
0.46% fail on
Power steering
- 0.15% fail on Operation
- 0.15% fail on Drive system
- 0.15% fail on Other components
- 0.31% fail on Steering operation
-
0.15% fail on
Steering control
- 0.15% fail on Steering wheel
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
2.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.92% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.31% fail on Attachment