Peugeot 205 MOT Results
Registered in 198771.1% pass rate
from 180 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1987 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
5.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.3% fail on Horn
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.56% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
5.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.56% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.56% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.56% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.56% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.2% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.56% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.56% fail on Windscreen
-
0.56% fail on
View to rear
- 0.56% fail on Mirrors
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 1987 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1987 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.56% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.56% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.56% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 1987 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(200% worse than other 1987 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1987 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(200% worse than other 1987 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.56% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.56% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.56% fail on Pipe
-
0.56% fail on
Load security
-
0.56% fail on
Dropside
- 0.56% fail on Other dropside component
-
0.56% fail on
Dropside
-
0.56% fail on
Seats
- 0.56% fail on Driver's seat
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
-
4.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.56% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.56% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.56% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.56% fail on Requirements
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Condition