Peugeot 205 MOT Results
Registered in 198668.7% pass rate
from 83 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1986 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.4% fail on Horn
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 1.2% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
8.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1986 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
- 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
9.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.2% fail on Brake fluid
- 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1986 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.2% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.2% fail on Sub-frame
-
1.2% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension arms
-
7.2% fail on
Visibility
- 7.2% fail on Washers
-
6.0% fail on
Steering
-
6.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.6% fail on Track rod end
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint
-
6.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.2% fail on Bumpers
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.2% fail on Joints
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
- 1.2% fail on Size/type
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.2% fail on Other leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks