Peugeot 205 MOT Results

Registered in 1986
68.7% pass rate
from 83 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1986 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.4% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.2% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
        • 9.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1986 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1986 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1986 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 7.2% fail on Washers
  • 6.0% fail on Steering
    • 6.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Other leaks

Search Good Garages