MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 2008 » 2017

Peugeot 2008 MOT Results

Registered in 2017
85.2% pass rate
from 16,730 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 2008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.29% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (51% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.042% fail on Horn
      • 0.0060% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.036% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0060% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.0060% fail on Position lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (23% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (36% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (50% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (18% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (18% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0060% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0060% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.41% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0060% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0060% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.072% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.072% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.042% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.0060% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0060% fail on Rbt
          • 0.0060% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.036% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.036% fail on Pedal
    • 0.036% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.030% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.018% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.024% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0060% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0060% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Prop shafts (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Joints (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Exhaust system (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.018% fail on Body
      • 0.018% fail on Other body component
    • 0.012% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0060% fail on Tank
      • 0.0060% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.012% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.0060% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0060% fail on Hinge
      • 0.0060% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0060% fail on Hinge
    • 0.0060% fail on Seats
      • 0.0060% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.2% fail on Visibility (69% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Washers (20% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Wipers (87% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.012% fail on Condition of glass (82% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Windscreen (81% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0060% fail on View to rear
      • 0.0060% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.45% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.44% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.25% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.072% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.042% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.012% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0060% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0060% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.0060% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.012% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0060% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0060% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.37% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0060% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.078% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.036% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.0060% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0060% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.048% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.018% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0060% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.012% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.27% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts (77% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (75% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0060% fail on Requirements
    • 0.048% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.096% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0060% fail on Condition
  • 0.090% fail on Identification of the vehicle (56% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Registration plates (56% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.060% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.030% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.012% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.012% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0060% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.0060% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0060% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 2008 (2013 - 2019)
    Excellent 1.2-litre PureTech petrol engine, more spacious and practical than the 208, post-facelift version looks smart.

    Search Good Garages