Peugeot 2008 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.1% pass rate
from 19,255 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 2008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.36% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.031% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 0.083% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.073% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.062% fail on Position lamps (64% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Position lamp (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.057% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.042% fail on Horn
      • 0.0052% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0052% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0052% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.026% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0052% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0052% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (20% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Size/type (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 2.0% fail on Brakes
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0052% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (48% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (45% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0052% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0052% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.052% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.052% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.021% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.021% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.047% fail on Pedal
      • 0.0052% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.026% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.021% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.016% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0052% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.021% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0052% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0052% fail on Lever
    • 0.0052% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0052% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0052% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Flexible couplings (31 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Prop shafts (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Joints (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Body
      • 0.047% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0052% fail on Body condition
    • 0.036% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.0052% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0052% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0052% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0052% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.0052% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0052% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0052% fail on Doors
      • 0.0052% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0052% fail on Catch
    • 0.0052% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0052% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.89% fail on Visibility (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Wipers (92% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.036% fail on View to rear
      • 0.036% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.010% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.61% fail on Suspension
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension arms (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.010% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0052% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.078% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.031% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.010% fail on Springs (93% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0052% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.0052% fail on Mounting
    • 0.0052% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0052% fail on Suspension unit
  • 0.35% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.33% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.026% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0052% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.036% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.0052% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.010% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.0052% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0052% fail on Undertray
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (65% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.0052% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0052% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates (47% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.088% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.068% fail on Attachment
    • 0.021% fail on Condition
  • 0.026% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.010% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.010% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0052% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.0052% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.0052% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0052% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 2008 (2013 - 2019)
    Excellent 1.2-litre PureTech petrol engine, more spacious and practical than the 208, post-facelift version looks smart.

    Search Good Garages