Peugeot 108 MOT Results
Registered in 201891.1% pass rate
from 8,609 tests in 2021
(27% better than other 2018 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2018 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 108 is unusually good or bad.
-
2.5% fail on
Visibility
(23% better than other 2018 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Wipers (35% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Washers
-
0.093% fail on
View to rear
(2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.058% fail on Windscreen
- 0.012% fail on Driver's view
-
2.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(25% better than other 2018 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2018 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.26% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.26% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.13% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.070% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.058% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.13% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.10% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.093% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.058% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.058% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.035% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.035% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.058% fail on
Front fog lamps
-
0.046% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.046% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.023% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.023% fail on Position lamp
-
0.023% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.023% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2018 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Tyres
(47% better than other 2018 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.56% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type (180% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brakes
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.80% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.80% fail on Brake pads
-
0.56% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.37% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.093% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt
-
0.035% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.035% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.035% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.035% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.035% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.035% fail on
Rbt
- 0.035% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.035% fail on
Rbt
-
0.035% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.035% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.012% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.093% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.070% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.035% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.023% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.012% fail on Pedal
- 0.012% fail on Hand lever
-
0.012% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.012% fail on Lever
-
0.012% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.012% fail on Reservoirs
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.38% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(78% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.012% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.012% fail on
Chassis
- 0.012% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.012% fail on
Transmission
-
0.012% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.012% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.012% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.012% fail on
Body
- 0.012% fail on Other body component
-
0.012% fail on
Doors
-
0.012% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.012% fail on Door condition
-
0.012% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.27% fail on
Suspension
- 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.093% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.023% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Linkage
-
0.023% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.012% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(67% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.035% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.14% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(76% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Registration plates (81% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.046% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(85% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Seat belts
(72% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.046% fail on
Seat belts
(72% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Steering
-
0.012% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.012% fail on Track rod end
-
0.012% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.012% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.012% fail on
Doors
- 0.012% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.012% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 108 (2014 - 2022)
Good standard specification for a low price, cheap to run and cheap to insure, surprisingly mature driving experience and capable out of town too.