MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 108 » 2017

Peugeot 108 MOT Results

Registered in 2017
88.7% pass rate
from 12,207 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 108 is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.88% fail on Washers
    • 0.082% fail on View to rear (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Mirrors (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.016% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0082% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0082% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs and drums (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0082% fail on Cable
    • 0.73% fail on Brake performance (51% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (83% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (89% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.098% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.098% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.049% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.049% fail on Rbt
          • 0.033% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.074% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.066% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.0082% fail on Pedal
    • 0.057% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.049% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.0082% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.049% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.049% fail on Lever
    • 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0082% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.0082% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.71% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.28% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp (41% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.016% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.025% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.025% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.025% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.016% fail on Horn
      • 0.0082% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.016% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (88% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0082% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.0082% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 0.68% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Transmission
      • 0.033% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.033% fail on Joints
      • 0.0082% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0082% fail on Joints
      • 0.0082% fail on Belts
    • 0.025% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.025% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Seats
      • 0.0082% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0082% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.0082% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0082% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.0082% fail on Doors
      • 0.0082% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0082% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0082% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0082% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.25% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Exhaust emissions (59% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.098% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0082% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0082% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.041% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.041% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.25% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.066% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.033% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.025% fail on Suspension arms (89% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.090% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.025% fail on Seat belts (81% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0082% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.0082% fail on Steering
    • 0.0082% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.0082% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 108 (2014 - 2022)
    Good standard specification for a low price, cheap to run and cheap to insure, surprisingly mature driving experience and capable out of town too.

    Search Good Garages