MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 108 » 2016

Peugeot 108 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.3% pass rate
from 17,308 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 108 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.0% fail on Visibility (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.040% fail on View to rear
      • 0.040% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.035% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.035% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.017% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0058% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.012% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0058% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.023% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.012% fail on Lever
        • 0.0058% fail on Cable
        • 0.0058% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.98% fail on Brake performance (34% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (59% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (59% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance (45% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt
          • 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.017% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0058% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0058% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0058% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0058% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.081% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.081% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.023% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever (72% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0058% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.075% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.064% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.012% fail on Pedal
    • 0.0058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0058% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.0058% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0058% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0058% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0058% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (20% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.42% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.21% fail on Direction indicators (41% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Flashing type (41% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (45% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.040% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Horn
    • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.035% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.035% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.023% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (88% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0058% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0058% fail on Switch
  • 0.67% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.54% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.023% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0058% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.023% fail on Transmission (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Body
      • 0.017% fail on Other body component
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.0058% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0058% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0058% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0058% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0058% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0058% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0058% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0058% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.53% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Exhaust emissions (41% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.040% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0058% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0058% fail on Oxygen sensor
    • 0.058% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0058% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.46% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0058% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0058% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0058% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.087% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.081% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0058% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.012% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0058% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0058% fail on Springs
      • 0.0058% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.0058% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.0058% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0058% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Attachment (83% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.092% fail on Identification of the vehicle (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Registration plates (59% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0058% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.087% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0058% fail on Requirements
    • 0.0058% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0058% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.035% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0058% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0058% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0058% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0058% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 108 (2014 - 2022)
    Good standard specification for a low price, cheap to run and cheap to insure, surprisingly mature driving experience and capable out of town too.

    Search Good Garages