Peugeot 108 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
89.5% pass rate
from 17,786 tests in 2020
(16% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 108 is unusually good or bad.

  • 2.8% fail on Brakes (39% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0056% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.74% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.017% fail on Cable
    • 0.58% fail on Brake performance (39% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance (73% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.067% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.067% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.056% fail on Rbt
          • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 0.096% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.084% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.079% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.011% fail on Pedal
    • 0.028% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0056% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0056% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.0056% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0056% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Indirect vision devices (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.039% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.039% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.096% fail on Position lamps (45% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.056% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.039% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Horn
      • 0.0056% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.017% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0056% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0056% fail on Switch
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.71% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Size/type
    • 0.056% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Exhaust system (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Transmission
      • 0.045% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.039% fail on Joints
        • 0.0056% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.011% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.011% fail on Joints
    • 0.039% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.028% fail on Body
      • 0.017% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0056% fail on Body condition
      • 0.0056% fail on Panel
    • 0.022% fail on Doors
      • 0.022% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
    • 0.011% fail on Integral vehicle structure (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0056% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0056% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0056% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0056% fail on Pipe
    • 0.0056% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0056% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0056% fail on Seats
      • 0.0056% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels (73% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Attachment (75% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.23% fail on Suspension (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.051% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0056% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (44% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.067% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.0056% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.0056% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.034% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Transmission oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.090% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.039% fail on Seat belts (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0056% fail on Attachment
  • 0.073% fail on Identification of the vehicle (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Registration plates (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0056% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.0056% fail on Steering
    • 0.0056% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0056% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 108 (2014 on)
    Good standard specification for a low price, cheap to run and cheap to insure, surprisingly mature driving experience and capable out of town too.

    Search Good Garages