MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 108 » 2015

Peugeot 108 MOT Results

Registered in 2015
82.6% pass rate
from 18,496 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 108 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.2% fail on Visibility (34% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.054% fail on View to rear
      • 0.054% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.027% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.027% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.016% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.011% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.011% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.011% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0054% fail on Cable
        • 0.0054% fail on Lever
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (61% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (87% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (87% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake performance (86% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (88% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (43% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (48% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (75% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (65% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (76% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.011% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever (94% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Pedal
    • 0.043% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0054% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0054% fail on Brake fluid
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (14% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.64% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp (34% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.24% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.070% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.059% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.038% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.016% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.049% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (80% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.032% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.032% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.011% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0054% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0054% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (65% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.054% fail on Compression ignition (88% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0054% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.059% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.054% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0054% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.82% fail on Suspension (75% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings (72% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.011% fail on Springs (99% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0054% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0054% fail on Axles
      • 0.0054% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 0.78% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.54% fail on Exhaust system (70% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.065% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0054% fail on Joints
    • 0.043% fail on Doors
      • 0.043% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0054% fail on Catch
    • 0.022% fail on Seats
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.011% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.016% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Other body component
    • 0.016% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.011% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0054% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.0054% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0054% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0054% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0054% fail on Pipe
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.027% fail on Seat belts (86% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.011% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0054% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0054% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle (41% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates (40% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.032% fail on Steering (92% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Locking devices
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 108 (2014 - 2022)
    Good standard specification for a low price, cheap to run and cheap to insure, surprisingly mature driving experience and capable out of town too.

    Search Good Garages