MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 107 » 2012

Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
74.0% pass rate
from 16,291 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (7.4% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (16% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.092% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.025% fail on Dipswitch (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.1% fail on Hazard warning (25 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Switch (25 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (19% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (19% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on All direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Switch (31 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (35% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.092% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.092% fail on Reversing lamps (52% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Reversing lamps (51% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.0061% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.018% fail on Position lamps (75% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Position lamp (81% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on All position lamps
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes (9.4% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (22% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (22% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.0061% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.025% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.012% fail on Cable
        • 0.012% fail on Lever
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (14% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.018% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0061% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (45% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (35% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (35% better than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.018% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.092% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (56% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.018% fail on Pedal (78% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Parking brake control (67% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Lever (61% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (83% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Anti-lock braking system (76% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.031% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.018% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (80% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.0061% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0061% fail on Valves
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (15% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (30% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Size/type (57% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on View to rear
      • 0.049% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.037% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.031% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.031% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (21% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.0061% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.0061% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0061% fail on Joints
    • 0.061% fail on Body
      • 0.043% fail on Other body component
      • 0.018% fail on Panel
    • 0.049% fail on Doors (65% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.025% fail on Door condition
      • 0.018% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.018% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0061% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0061% fail on Door condition
    • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.025% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0061% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0061% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.012% fail on Fuel system (91% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (87% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0061% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0061% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0061% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0061% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0061% fail on Seats
      • 0.0061% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0061% fail on Undertray
  • 1.7% fail on Suspension (82% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Linkage
      • 0.012% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints (98% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0061% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.49% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (58% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint (96% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (97% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.086% fail on Shock absorbers (84% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Springs (99% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Mounting
        • 0.018% fail on Coil spring (100% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.037% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.012% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.037% fail on Other suspension component (76% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0061% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0061% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (20% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (18% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (24% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested (88% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0061% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0061% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.049% fail on Compression ignition (93% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0061% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0061% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.068% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.055% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.012% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.45% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (31% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.092% fail on Seat belts (66% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0061% fail on Requirements
    • 0.0061% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0061% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.36% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Power steering
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
    • 0.018% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Steering play
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Attachment (89% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates (55% better than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages