Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
82.0% pass rate
from 14,161 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (10% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (27% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.064% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning (21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Switch (21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Lamp (21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Tell tale (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp (51% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators (48% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type (48% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.071% fail on Individual lamps (82% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Tell tales (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Fog lamp (89% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0071% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.31% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.028% fail on Battery
    • 0.028% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0071% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth (32% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (23% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Size/type
    • 0.028% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on Washers (22% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.078% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.9% fail on Brakes
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs (94% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.59% fail on Front wheels (74% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Rear wheels (58% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.092% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.021% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.014% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.0071% fail on Hoses
        • 0.0071% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.014% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.0071% fail on Operation
      • 0.0071% fail on Leaks
    • 0.049% fail on Parking brake (76% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.014% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.014% fail on Pedal
        • 0.014% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.014% fail on ABS (82% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.64% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.30% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.014% fail on Fuel system (87% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Cap (82% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.58% fail on Suspension (84% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.099% fail on Rear
      • 0.014% fail on Front (83% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Location (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0071% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Front drive shafts (77% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Couplings (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.0071% fail on Condition
      • 0.0071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.042% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.014% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.0071% fail on General condition
    • 0.0071% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.0071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0071% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0071% fail on Condition
    • 0.0071% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0071% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels (50% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.30% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.028% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.056% fail on Seat belts (68% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.0071% fail on Attachment
  • 0.17% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.021% fail on Body security
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.0071% fail on Passengers
      • 0.0071% fail on Drivers
    • 0.0071% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.0071% fail on Doors
      • 0.0071% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.0071% fail on Load security
      • 0.0071% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.17% fail on Registration plates and VIN (55% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plate (55% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Steering (71% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Steering system (83% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0071% fail on Free play
        • 0.0071% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0071% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0071% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0071% fail on Other components
        • 0.0071% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.042% fail on Power steering
      • 0.035% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.0071% fail on Operation
    • 0.014% fail on Steering control
      • 0.0071% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.0071% fail on Steering wheel
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages