Peugeot 107 MOT Results
Registered in 201076.2% pass rate
from 13,480 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.
-
9.7% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(27% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Position lamps
(35% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Front lamps (26% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Rear lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on All position lamps
- 0.99% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Hazard warning
(14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Lamp (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Tell tale (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Headlamps
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Matched pair
-
0.50% fail on
Direction indicators
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Tell tales (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.10% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Side repeaters (92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0074% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.0074% fail on Switch
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.28% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Horn
- 0.067% fail on Battery
- 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0074% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
6.9% fail on
Brakes
(23% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.89% fail on Brake discs (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.7% fail on
Brake performance
(22% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Front wheels (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.059% fail on Brake operation (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Components
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Hoses
- 0.0074% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.015% fail on Leaks
-
2.0% fail on
Components
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.052% fail on ABS (74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Service brake control components
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Pedal
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Condition
- 0.0074% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.015% fail on
Pedal
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0074% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.0074% fail on Cable
-
0.0074% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.0074% fail on
Components
- 0.0074% fail on Pipes
-
0.0074% fail on
Components
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
-
6.1% fail on
Tyres
(9.6% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Valve stem
- 0.067% fail on Size/type
-
5.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
- 0.10% fail on Mirrors
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Attachment
- 0.015% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.21% fail on Front
- 0.18% fail on Rear
-
0.34% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0074% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.0074% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Location (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Front suspension joints (62% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Shock absorbers
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.015% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.0074% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.0074% fail on Condition
-
0.0074% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0074% fail on Condition
-
0.0074% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.0074% fail on Component mounting
-
0.60% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.045% fail on
Fuel system
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Pipe
- 0.015% fail on Cap (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Tank
-
0.39% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.33% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.022% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.059% fail on
Seat belts
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
-
0.33% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Hubs
-
0.24% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint
- 0.022% fail on Drag link end
-
0.022% fail on
Other components
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Steering pivot point (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Steering arm
-
0.059% fail on
Power steering
- 0.059% fail on Electronic power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Registration plate (51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Body condition
-
0.059% fail on
Doors
- 0.022% fail on Passengers front
- 0.022% fail on Passengers other
- 0.015% fail on Drivers
- 0.030% fail on Body security
-
0.022% fail on
Seats
- 0.015% fail on Drivers
- 0.0074% fail on Passengers
-
0.0074% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.0074% fail on Chassis
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.