Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.2% pass rate
from 13,480 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.7% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps (26% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.99% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Hazard warning (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Lamp (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Tell tale (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.50% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Tell tales (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.10% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Side repeaters (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0074% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.067% fail on Battery
    • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.0074% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 6.9% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Front wheels (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.059% fail on Brake operation (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Hoses
        • 0.0074% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.015% fail on Leaks
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on ABS (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Service brake control components (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Pedal (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0074% fail on Condition
        • 0.0074% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.0074% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.0074% fail on Cable
    • 0.0074% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0074% fail on Components
        • 0.0074% fail on Pipes
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres (9.6% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.067% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.0% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Suspension arms (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
      • 0.015% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.21% fail on Front
      • 0.18% fail on Rear
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front drive shafts (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.0074% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.14% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Location (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension joints (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.015% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.0074% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.0074% fail on Condition
    • 0.0074% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0074% fail on Condition
    • 0.0074% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0074% fail on Component mounting
  • 1.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.045% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Pipe
      • 0.015% fail on Cap (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Tank
  • 0.39% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.022% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.059% fail on Seat belts (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Requirements
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0074% fail on Hubs
  • 0.24% fail on Steering (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.022% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Steering pivot point (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.059% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Electronic power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Registration plates and VIN (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plate (51% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.19% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Body condition
    • 0.059% fail on Doors
      • 0.022% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.022% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.015% fail on Drivers
    • 0.030% fail on Body security
    • 0.022% fail on Seats
      • 0.015% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0074% fail on Passengers
    • 0.0074% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.0074% fail on Chassis
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages