MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 107 » 2010

Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.1% pass rate
from 15,159 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.053% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.086% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.66% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (14% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.040% fail on Cable
        • 0.020% fail on Lever
        • 0.0066% fail on Linkage
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.040% fail on Pedal (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.079% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.073% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.013% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.013% fail on Brake fluid (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.0066% fail on Valves
    • 0.013% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0066% fail on Other components
      • 0.0066% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.0066% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 8.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp levelling device (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.00% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Switch (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Semaphore (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Switch (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0066% fail on Arm
    • 0.81% fail on Hazard warning (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.079% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.033% fail on Main beam tell-tale (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.059% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.040% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on View to rear
      • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.053% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.053% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.013% fail on Bonnet (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0066% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Size/type (64% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Suspension arm (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage ball joints (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0066% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0066% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0066% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0066% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.44% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.079% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Other suspension component (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0066% fail on Axles
      • 0.0066% fail on Axle
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.14% fail on Compression ignition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0066% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0066% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.079% fail on Fluid leaks (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Engine oil leaks (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0066% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.020% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.020% fail on Joints
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.073% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.066% fail on Chassis (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Body
      • 0.053% fail on Other body component
      • 0.013% fail on Panel
    • 0.040% fail on Fuel system (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Tank
    • 0.020% fail on Doors (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.013% fail on Hinge (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0066% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0066% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0066% fail on Hinge
    • 0.013% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Passenger compartment (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0066% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0066% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0066% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0066% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.63% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.092% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Attachment
    • 0.013% fail on Airbags
      • 0.013% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.53% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering linkage components (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0066% fail on Other components
        • 0.0066% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.086% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Steering play
      • 0.059% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.046% fail on Power steering
      • 0.046% fail on Operation
    • 0.026% fail on Steering gear (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Steering rack (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Steering column
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Attachment (85% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates (67% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.013% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.013% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.0066% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0066% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages