MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 107 » 2009

Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
62.2% pass rate
from 14,217 tests in 2021
(5.5% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Plate brake tester (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.0070% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.96% fail on Rbt
          • 0.84% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0070% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0070% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0070% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.014% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.070% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.028% fail on Cable (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Lever
        • 0.014% fail on Linkage
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.042% fail on Pedal (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.091% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.0070% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.084% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.049% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0070% fail on Servos
      • 0.0070% fail on Valves
    • 0.0070% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (6.3% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (18% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (14% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (25% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (26% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (27% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Switch (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Semaphore (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Switch (44 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Arm
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.014% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.86% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Hazard warning (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.042% fail on Position lamps (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Position lamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0070% fail on Switch
    • 0.021% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0070% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0070% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension arm (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.45% fail on Macpherson strut (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.32% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Mounting
        • 0.056% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0070% fail on Axles
      • 0.0070% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0070% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0070% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility (10% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on View to rear (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Mirrors (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Condition of glass (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Windscreen (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Bonnet (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Size/type (51% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (13% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Prop shafts (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Joints
      • 0.014% fail on Belts
    • 0.27% fail on Bumpers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.035% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.15% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Body
      • 0.042% fail on Other body component
      • 0.035% fail on Panel
      • 0.0070% fail on Body condition
    • 0.049% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on System
    • 0.035% fail on Doors (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Other passenger's door (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Door condition
    • 0.028% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.021% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.021% fail on Seats (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0070% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.014% fail on Cabs
      • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.0070% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0070% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (14% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Spark ignition (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition (84% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.014% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (98% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (97% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.084% fail on Fluid leaks (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Engine oil leaks (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0070% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.65% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0070% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0070% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.028% fail on Airbags
      • 0.028% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.39% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.098% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Steering play
      • 0.035% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.028% fail on Steering gear (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.014% fail on Power steering (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates (70% better than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages