Peugeot 107 MOT Results
Registered in 200865.5% pass rate
from 13,092 tests in 2017
(6.5% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(6.7% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (58% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.9% fail on Front lamps
- 0.57% fail on Rear lamps (49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on All position lamps
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0076% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.0076% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.76% fail on
Direction indicators
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Flashing type
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.076% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Tell tales
-
0.023% fail on
Semaphore
(56 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Switch (76 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Arm
-
0.73% fail on
Flashing type
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Hazard warning
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Lamp (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Tell tale
-
0.25% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Fog lamp (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Tell tale
- 0.18% fail on Battery
- 0.053% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.0076% fail on Electrical wiring
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
(19% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Hoses
- 0.0076% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.12% fail on Leaks
- 0.031% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.0076% fail on Operation
-
3.8% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Rear wheels (42% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels
- 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.092% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.076% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.023% fail on Brake operation
- 0.0076% fail on Parking brake operation
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads (18% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Brake discs (27% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.015% fail on Brake calipers (85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.11% fail on ABS (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.023% fail on Cable
- 0.0076% fail on Locking devices
-
3.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
(10% better than other 2008 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition (29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Valve stem
- 0.11% fail on Size/type (48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
6.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.0% fail on Wipers (31% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (19% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Windscreen
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0076% fail on Bonnet
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Front
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(19% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (20% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Attachment
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Linkage condition (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Condition
- 0.0076% fail on Attachment
- 0.34% fail on Front suspension joints (46% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Drive shafts
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Front drive shafts
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Constant velocity joints (84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.32% fail on
Front drive shafts
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Shock absorbers
(87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Macpherson strut
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Location
- 0.0076% fail on Condition
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
(72% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Component mounting
-
0.023% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.023% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Sub-frames
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Condition
-
0.0076% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.0076% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.0076% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.0076% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(46% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Emissions (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested (94% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.084% fail on
Fuel system
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Cap
-
0.82% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.68% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.61% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.069% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
0.68% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Attachment (94% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Steering
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Ball joint
- 0.069% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Free play
- 0.023% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0076% fail on Steering arm
-
0.099% fail on
Power steering
- 0.099% fail on Electronic power steering (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0076% fail on
Steering control
- 0.0076% fail on Steering lock
-
0.22% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(42% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Registration plate (42% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Body condition
-
0.038% fail on
Doors
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Passengers other (67% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.023% fail on Chassis
- 0.023% fail on Body security
-
0.015% fail on
Seats
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Passengers
- 0.0076% fail on Drivers
-
0.015% fail on
Load security
- 0.0076% fail on Bootlid
- 0.0076% fail on Tailgate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.