MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 107 » 2005

Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.3% pass rate
from 2,860 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamps (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.035% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 6.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.2% fail on Front lamps (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Rear lamps (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Hazard warning (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Lamp (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (47% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.42% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Switch (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (61% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.66% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.59% fail on Battery
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 11% fail on Brakes (19% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (23% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.035% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.2% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.070% fail on Hoses (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.24% fail on Leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.21% fail on ABS (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.035% fail on Pedal
        • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 0.035% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.035% fail on Cable
    • 0.035% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.035% fail on Components
        • 0.035% fail on Servos
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.070% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.035% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.070% fail on Fuel system (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Hose
      • 0.035% fail on Cap
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.84% fail on Front
      • 0.70% fail on Rear
    • 0.98% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.070% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.73% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Front suspension joints (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front drive shafts (95% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.070% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.035% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.035% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
  • 0.98% fail on Steering (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.31% fail on Steering system (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.035% fail on Free play
        • 0.035% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.070% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.035% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.56% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Body condition
    • 0.070% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.070% fail on Chassis
    • 0.070% fail on Body security
    • 0.035% fail on Doors
      • 0.035% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.035% fail on Seats
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate (60% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages