MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 107 » 2005

Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.6% pass rate
from 2,809 tests in 2020
(0.76% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Headlamps (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (6.2% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (8.6% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5.8% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators (13% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type (13% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters (51% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Switch (45 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hazard warning (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Switch (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies) (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.93% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5.1% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp (5.0% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp (3.1% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Position lamps (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Position lamp (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 13% fail on Brakes (3.2% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (11% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance (8.1% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.071% fail on Plate brake tester (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.071% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (37% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (34% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (6.5% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (6.8% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2.5% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.93% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4.6% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp) (7.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance (8.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (8.0% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (5.0% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (0.78% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads (2.9% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Brake linings (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (57% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Rod
        • 0.036% fail on Cable
        • 0.036% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control (29% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Lever (22% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (37% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever (3.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses (65% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic systems (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.036% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.036% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.036% fail on Valves
    • 0.036% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Suspension arm (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (1.5% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage ball joints (96% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.39% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Sub-frames (15% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame (7.5% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (9.2% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Springs (98% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Suspension rods (22% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Other suspension component (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.036% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (4.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.036% fail on Joints
      • 0.036% fail on Belts
    • 0.57% fail on Chassis (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis condition (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Bumpers (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Body (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Panel (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Floor (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Seats (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Passenger's seat (19% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (18% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Spark ignition (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8.9% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.071% fail on Oxygen sensor (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.036% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.071% fail on Non catalyst emissions (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Compression ignition (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (17% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks (68% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres (0.12% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth (8.0% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition (11% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type (62% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (14% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (2.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear (25% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.036% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.036% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Airbags
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.64% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.18% fail on Electronic power steering (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Power steering
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates (23% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels (1.9% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages