Peugeot 107 MOT Results
Registered in 200556.3% pass rate
from 2,860 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Headlamps
(63% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.035% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
6.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.2% fail on Front lamps (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Rear lamps (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.070% fail on All position lamps
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Hazard warning
(18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Switch (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Lamp (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Tell tale
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.42% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Switch (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.66% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.59% fail on Battery
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(19% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(23% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.035% fail on Brake operation
-
3.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.2% fail on
Components
- 3.1% fail on Pipes
- 0.070% fail on Hoses (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.24% fail on Leaks
- 0.035% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Components
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.45% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.21% fail on ABS (77% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.035% fail on
Pedal
- 0.035% fail on Condition
-
0.035% fail on
Pedal
-
0.035% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.035% fail on Cable
-
0.035% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.035% fail on
Components
- 0.035% fail on Servos
-
0.035% fail on
Components
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(23% better than other 2005 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 5.9% fail on Tread depth
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Valve stem
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
8.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 0.63% fail on Windscreen
- 0.070% fail on Mirrors
- 0.035% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
6.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(26% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Emissions (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.070% fail on
Fuel system
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Hose
- 0.035% fail on Cap
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.84% fail on Front
- 0.70% fail on Rear
-
0.98% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.91% fail on Component mounting
- 0.070% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.73% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.35% fail on
Shock absorbers
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Front suspension joints (75% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Drive shafts
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.070% fail on Condition
- 0.035% fail on Attachment
-
0.035% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.035% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.035% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.035% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(95% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.42% fail on
Seat belts
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Attachment
-
2.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(95% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Power steering
- 0.42% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Operation
-
0.31% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Ball joint
-
0.035% fail on
Free play
- 0.035% fail on Steering rack
- 0.070% fail on Locking devices
- 0.035% fail on Steering operation
- 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.52% fail on
Power steering
-
0.56% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.49% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Body condition
-
0.070% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.070% fail on Chassis
- 0.070% fail on Body security
-
0.035% fail on
Doors
- 0.035% fail on Passengers other
-
0.035% fail on
Seats
- 0.035% fail on Drivers
-
0.31% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Registration plate (60% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.