Peugeot 106 MOT Results
Registered in 200356.2% pass rate
from 1,001 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(68% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
(72% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
(72% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.100% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.80% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.80% fail on Brake pads
-
0.70% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.70% fail on Brake discs
-
0.30% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.30% fail on Cable
-
0.80% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (66% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.50% fail on Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
-
0.30% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.100% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.30% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.100% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.100% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(65% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.30% fail on Joints
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (71% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Driver's seat (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.90% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.60% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.80% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.80% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.70% fail on
Doors
-
0.30% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.30% fail on Door condition
-
0.30% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.30% fail on Door condition
-
0.100% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.100% fail on Door condition
-
0.30% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.30% fail on
Chassis
- 0.30% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.100% fail on Bumpers
-
0.100% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.100% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.100% fail on
Body
- 0.100% fail on Other body component
-
6.6% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Horn
- 0.100% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(31% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(47% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.100% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.20% fail on
Compression ignition
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
9.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(47% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(31% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 4.6% fail on Washers
-
0.60% fail on
View to rear
- 0.60% fail on Mirrors
-
0.100% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.100% fail on Windscreen
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.100% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.100% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.60% fail on
Axles
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Axle
-
0.40% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.30% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.100% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
(92% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Mounting
- 0.100% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.100% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.100% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.1% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Power steering
- 0.40% fail on Operation
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
(94% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Track rod end
- 0.100% fail on Locking devices
- 0.20% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.100% fail on
Steering play
- 0.100% fail on Steering rack
-
4.1% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.100% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Airbags
- 0.20% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.70% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.70% fail on Registration plates