MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 106 » 2002

Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
54.3% pass rate
from 1,865 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.054% fail on Matched pair
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.054% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.054% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.054% fail on Switch
    • 0.054% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Transmission (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Joints (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.48% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.48% fail on Door condition
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.11% fail on Catch (21 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Hinge (21 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Tank
      • 0.054% fail on System
    • 0.32% fail on Chassis
      • 0.32% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Carrier (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.054% fail on Towbar
      • 0.054% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.054% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.054% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.054% fail on Cabs
      • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (97% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (47% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt
          • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs and drums (55% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.38% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.32% fail on Cable
        • 0.054% fail on Lever
      • 0.21% fail on Brake linings and pads (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Brake pads (88% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake control (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Lever (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.054% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.054% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.054% fail on Valves
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.16% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.054% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Spark ignition (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.054% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.054% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.054% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.43% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.054% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 10% fail on Visibility (29% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.48% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.054% fail on Window
    • 0.054% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.054% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.7% fail on Suspension (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.80% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Axle (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Stub axle (48 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.38% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 6.2% fail on Steering (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering linkage components (94% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.054% fail on Steering play
      • 0.054% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages