Peugeot 106 MOT Results
Registered in 200249.4% pass rate
from 4,882 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
8.5% fail on
Position lamps
(16% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Front lamps (24% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on All position lamps
- 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(31% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp (29% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Dipswitch
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Individual lamps (76% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.082% fail on Switch
- 0.020% fail on Tell tales
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Battery (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.061% fail on Tell tale
- 0.041% fail on Switch
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.082% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.082% fail on Lamp
- 0.020% fail on Tell tale
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.5% fail on
Position lamps
(16% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(23% better than other 2002 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Couplings
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
-
9.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting
- 0.66% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (49% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.76% fail on Front
- 0.61% fail on Rear (42% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Front suspension joints (39% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Linkage condition (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
0.47% fail on
Radius arms
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Axles
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Axle beam (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Swivel joints/housing (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Stub axle (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Clearance
-
0.35% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.27% fail on
Shock absorbers
(82% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Macpherson strut
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Sub-frames
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.061% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.041% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.020% fail on Condition
- 0.041% fail on General condition
-
0.041% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.041% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(44% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rear wheels (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (40% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.041% fail on Brake operation
-
3.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Components
(55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pipes (48% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Hoses (83% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.061% fail on Cylinders
- 0.020% fail on Servos
- 0.020% fail on Valves
- 0.43% fail on Leaks
- 0.29% fail on Operation (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Components
(55% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (46% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Brake discs
- 0.14% fail on Wheel cylinder (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
- 0.020% fail on Brake drums
- 0.020% fail on Brake back plates
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.020% fail on Fitment
-
0.72% fail on
Service brake control components
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Pedal
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Anti-slip (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Pedal
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.16% fail on Cable
- 0.020% fail on Linkage
- 0.020% fail on Lever
-
0.082% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.061% fail on
Components
- 0.041% fail on Servos
- 0.020% fail on Hoses
- 0.020% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.061% fail on
Components
- 0.061% fail on ABS (94% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Restricted movement (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(44% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Cap (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Pipe
- 0.020% fail on Tank
- 0.020% fail on Hose
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(31% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Mirrors
- 0.57% fail on Windscreen
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
-
9.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.6% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Size/type
- 0.20% fail on Valve stem
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
(33% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Steering system
(46% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Steering damper
-
0.18% fail on
Steering control
- 0.10% fail on Steering column
- 0.041% fail on Steering lock
- 0.041% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.12% fail on
Power steering
(76% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Operation
- 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.020% fail on Other components
- 0.061% fail on Steering operation
-
6.3% fail on
Steering system
(46% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(25% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas (68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Requirements
-
4.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(43% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Drivers (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
(49% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Passengers other
- 0.23% fail on Passengers front
- 0.47% fail on Body condition (60% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.31% fail on Chassis
- 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.020% fail on Speedometer
-
0.020% fail on
Load security
- 0.020% fail on Access panel
-
2.0% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(34% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Registration plate (35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.10% fail on
Road Wheels
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2002 cars)