Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.2% pass rate
from 3,189 tests in 2020
(5.1% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Stop lamp (24% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.063% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.031% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.031% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.031% fail on Switch
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.094% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.094% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.31% fail on Joints
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Driver's seat (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.63% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Hose (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.063% fail on System
    • 0.94% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Hinge (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Catch (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
        • 0.063% fail on Catch (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
        • 0.031% fail on Hinge
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Carrier (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.25% fail on Chassis (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Chassis condition (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.094% fail on Panel
      • 0.094% fail on Other body component
      • 0.031% fail on Body condition
    • 0.094% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.031% fail on Bracket
    • 0.031% fail on Cabs
      • 0.031% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (31% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.094% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.031% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (32% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (29% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (59% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.094% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.031% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.031% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (55% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums (47% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Brake discs (53% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.28% fail on Cable
        • 0.031% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.69% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.63% fail on Lever
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.094% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Other components
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.063% fail on Oxygen sensor (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.063% fail on NOx sensor (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.031% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.094% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.38% fail on Compression ignition (67% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.094% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.063% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.63% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility (27% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.82% fail on View to rear (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.063% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.5% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (29% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.47% fail on Axles (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Axle (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Stub axle (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover (90% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.25% fail on Springs (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.094% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Mounting
        • 0.031% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.031% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.063% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (28% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.063% fail on Power steering (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
    • 0.031% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.031% fail on Steering column
    • 0.031% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.031% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.031% fail on Steering play
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Requirements
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.031% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages