Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
45.9% pass rate
from 3,246 tests in 2017
(9.9% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Position lamps (22% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.031% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps (22% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Switch
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.031% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Tell tales (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.092% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Horn (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.031% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.031% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 21% fail on Brakes (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Front wheels (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Rear wheels (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.092% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Components (55% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Pipes (46% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.062% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.062% fail on Valves (91% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components (42% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (47% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Wheel cylinder (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.062% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.062% fail on Cable
    • 0.062% fail on ABS (96% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.031% fail on Components
        • 0.031% fail on Servos
  • 21% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (50% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 20% fail on Suspension (9.1% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Drive shafts (98% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Front drive shafts (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (25% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Spring mounting (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (30% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (29% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Attachment
      • 0.031% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Rear
      • 1.0% fail on Front
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.062% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.092% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Trailing arms (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on General condition
    • 0.031% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.031% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Washers (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.92% fail on Mirrors (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
    • 0.062% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Steering system (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Free play
        • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.031% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.031% fail on Pump
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.092% fail on Steering control
      • 0.062% fail on Steering column
      • 0.031% fail on Steering lock
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts (25% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (27% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
  • 4.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (35% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Doors (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.0% fail on Seats (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.77% fail on Chassis
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.031% fail on Body security
    • 0.031% fail on Load security
      • 0.031% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.71% fail on Registration plates and VIN (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plate (45% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.092% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages