Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.6% pass rate
from 1,791 tests in 2020
(14% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.056% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.056% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.056% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (39% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (46% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (46% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.67% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Cable (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (41% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Parking brake control (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Lever (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.056% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.056% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system (88% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.056% fail on Leaks
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.11% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.61% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.11% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.056% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.056% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Transmission (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Joints
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.1% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Hinge (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
        • 0.11% fail on Catch (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Hinge
      • 0.34% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Pipe (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Hose (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.056% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
      • 0.17% fail on Other body component
    • 0.22% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Carrier
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.056% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.056% fail on Bracket
    • 0.11% fail on Floor
    • 0.056% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.056% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 11% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Washers (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.84% fail on View to rear (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.11% fail on Indirect vision devices (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.61% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.50% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.50% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Axle
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.22% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.056% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.056% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.056% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 7.2% fail on Steering (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.056% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.056% fail on Attachment
  • 0.056% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.056% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.056% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.056% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages