Peugeot 106 MOT Results
Registered in 200051.6% pass rate
from 936 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(34% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
9.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(85% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.32% fail on
Plate brake tester
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(47% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Hand lever
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.64% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.64% fail on Brake pads
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.11% fail on Cable
-
0.64% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Lever (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.21% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Horn
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.11% fail on Position lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
16% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(87% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(97% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 13% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.21% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.96% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.53% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(97% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(63% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Drive shaft (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.21% fail on Joints
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
(200% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.53% fail on Door condition
- 0.11% fail on Catch
-
0.53% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
- 0.21% fail on Hinge (36 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.75% fail on
Seats
- 0.64% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.64% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Hose
- 0.21% fail on Pipe
- 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on System
-
0.43% fail on
Chassis
- 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.43% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Other body component
-
0.11% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.11% fail on Floor
-
10% fail on
Visibility
(31% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
-
0.75% fail on
View to rear
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(33% better than other 2000 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(59% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.75% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(80% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.11% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.53% fail on
Springs
(81% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Coil springs
(88% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.32% fail on
Coil springs
(88% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Axles
- 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
7.4% fail on
Steering
(94% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
(86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Other components
-
6.8% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Requirements
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.43% fail on Size/type
-
0.75% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.75% fail on Registration plates
-
0.21% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
(7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Speedometer (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment