Peugeot 106 MOT Results
Registered in 199942.9% pass rate
from 1,376 tests in 2017
(17% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 21% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Exhaust system (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Hose
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(18% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Component mounting (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Spring mounting
-
7.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Couplings
-
0.073% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.073% fail on Drive shafts
-
7.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Rear
- 0.65% fail on Front
-
1.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.94% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.44% fail on
Radius arms
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.073% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(91% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.073% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.36% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Location
- 0.15% fail on Condition (95% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.36% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Axles
- 0.073% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.073% fail on Clearance
- 0.15% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
- 0.073% fail on General condition
-
0.073% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.1% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.15% fail on Tell tales
- 0.073% fail on Switch
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(44% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.073% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.073% fail on Switch
- 1.9% fail on Battery (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Tell tale
- 0.80% fail on Horn
- 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.073% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(24% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(81% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10.0% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Rear wheels (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.073% fail on Brake operation
-
3.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Components
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pipes (62% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Hoses (64% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.073% fail on Valves
- 0.73% fail on Leaks
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Components
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.58% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Brake drums (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Brake linings
- 0.073% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.073% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.80% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.80% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Mechanical components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.15% fail on ABS (90% better than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(81% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 5.4% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Mirrors
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
- 0.073% fail on Bonnet
-
8.6% fail on
Steering
(89% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
0.073% fail on
Free play
- 0.073% fail on Steering rack
-
0.073% fail on
Other components
- 0.073% fail on Steering component
- 0.22% fail on Steering operation
-
0.22% fail on
Power steering
- 0.073% fail on Operation
- 0.073% fail on Rams
- 0.073% fail on Other components
-
0.073% fail on
Steering control
- 0.073% fail on Steering wheel
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.44% fail on Size/type
- 0.073% fail on Valve stem
-
6.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(49% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Body condition
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Passengers other
- 0.36% fail on Passengers front
-
1.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Chassis
-
0.80% fail on
Seats
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Passengers
- 0.29% fail on Speedometer (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Body security
- 0.073% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.073% fail on Spare wheel
-
5.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.58% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (64% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.73% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.73% fail on Registration plate
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
- 0.15% fail on Condition