MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 106 » 1999

Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
42.9% pass rate
from 1,376 tests in 2017
(17% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 21% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust system (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Hose
  • 25% fail on Suspension (18% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 13% fail on Component mounting (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front drive shafts (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Couplings
      • 0.073% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.073% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
      • 0.65% fail on Front
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.44% fail on Radius arms (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.073% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Anti-roll bars (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.073% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.36% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Location
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (95% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.073% fail on Swivel joints/housing
      • 0.073% fail on Clearance
    • 0.15% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.073% fail on General condition
    • 0.073% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.15% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.073% fail on Switch
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.073% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.073% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Battery (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.80% fail on Horn
    • 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.073% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10.0% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Rear wheels (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.073% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (51% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Components (61% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes (62% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Hoses (64% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.073% fail on Valves
      • 0.73% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake drums (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.073% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.073% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.80% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on ABS (90% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.073% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.6% fail on Steering (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.073% fail on Free play
        • 0.073% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
        • 0.073% fail on Steering component
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.073% fail on Operation
      • 0.073% fail on Rams
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
    • 0.073% fail on Steering control
      • 0.073% fail on Steering wheel
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
    • 0.073% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.36% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis
    • 0.80% fail on Seats (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers
    • 0.29% fail on Speedometer (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Body security
    • 0.073% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.073% fail on Spare wheel
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (64% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.73% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages