Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1999

49.3% pass rate

from 765 tests in 2020

(14% worse than other 1999 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 22% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 21% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 20% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.39% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 0.13% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.13% fail on Catalytic converter
  - 0.39% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    - 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.65% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.13% fail on Other leaks
21% fail on Brakes (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 17% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 7.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Rbt (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (94% worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
    - 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
  - 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt
      - 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.0% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.65% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.52% fail on Cable
    - 0.13% fail on Lever
  - 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.52% fail on Brake discs
- 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.78% fail on Hand lever (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Pedal
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.65% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Valves
- 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  - 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
    - 0.13% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.9% fail on Position lamps
  - 3.9% fail on Position lamp
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.0% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.13% fail on Switch
- 2.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.5% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 1.0% fail on Horn
- 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (44% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 7.2% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Drive shaft
  - 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.26% fail on Joints
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.1% fail on Chassis
  - 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  - 0.13% fail on Strengthening plate
- 1.3% fail on Fuel system
  - 1.0% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Hose
  - 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.92% fail on Doors
  - 0.65% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.39% fail on Door condition
    - 0.26% fail on Catch (38 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.26% fail on Door condition
- 0.26% fail on Seats
  - 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.26% fail on Cabs
  - 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
- 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
  - 0.13% fail on Carrier
- 0.13% fail on Towbar
  - 0.13% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.13% fail on Floor
15% fail on Suspension
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.65% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.65% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.52% fail on Springs (77% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Coil springs (81% better than other 1999 cars)
    - 0.39% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Axles
  - 0.13% fail on Axle
  - 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
8.1% fail on Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 0.52% fail on View to rear
  - 0.52% fail on Mirrors
6.3% fail on Steering (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.26% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Other components
    - 0.13% fail on Steering component
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Power steering
  - 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.13% fail on Steering play
  - 0.13% fail on Steering rack
5.0% fail on Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.9% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.39% fail on Condition
  - 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Airbags
  - 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.65% fail on Registration plates
0.26% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Attachment