Peugeot 106 MOT Results
Registered in 199855.6% pass rate
from 1,064 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
17% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.28% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.28% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.19% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.94% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.094% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.094% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
17% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Other leaks
-
18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(47% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(90% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
(79% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.19% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.19% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
(79% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(49% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (85% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
9.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.56% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.56% fail on Brake discs
-
0.47% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.47% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Hand lever
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.47% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.094% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.38% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.094% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.094% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.094% fail on Valves
- 0.28% fail on Load sensing valves
- 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.094% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.094% fail on Other components
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(90% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(41% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (91% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Transmission
(64% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(66% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Joints (67% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.28% fail on Joints
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(66% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.47% fail on Door condition
-
0.75% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.94% fail on
Seats
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.75% fail on
Chassis
- 0.66% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.094% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.56% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Pipe
- 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.094% fail on Hose
-
0.28% fail on
Spare wheel
(11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Carrier (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
-
0.094% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.094% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.094% fail on
Body
- 0.094% fail on Panel
-
0.094% fail on
Cabs
- 0.094% fail on Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.94% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.75% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.094% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.66% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.38% fail on Horn
- 0.094% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.094% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.094% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.094% fail on Position lamp
-
0.094% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.094% fail on Switch
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(24% better than other 1998 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.094% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.66% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.094% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.56% fail on
Springs
(72% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.38% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Axles
- 0.38% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.094% fail on Stub axle
-
0.47% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.094% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.094% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
(31% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
-
0.47% fail on
View to rear
- 0.38% fail on Mirrors
- 0.094% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.19% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.19% fail on Windscreen
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Steering linkage components
(77% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Steering arm
-
0.19% fail on
Power steering
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Electronic power steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(53% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.75% fail on
Seat belts
(74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (80% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Condition
-
0.85% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.85% fail on Registration plates
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment