Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
55.3% pass rate
from 886 tests in 2021
(21% worse than other 1997 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 18% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.11% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.68% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.56% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 18% fail on Brakes (54% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (76% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (82% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (64% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt
          • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.68% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.68% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.90% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.56% fail on Pedal
      • 0.34% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.79% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Valves
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.11% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
    • 0.11% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.23% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.23% fail on Joints
      • 0.11% fail on Belts
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (64% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Doors (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Door condition
        • 0.11% fail on Catch
      • 0.56% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.56% fail on Door condition
      • 0.45% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.79% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Panel
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.11% fail on System
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.90% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.56% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Springs
      • 0.90% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.90% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.56% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on Stub axle (23 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Axle
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.34% fail on View to rear
      • 0.34% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (56% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (63% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Steering column
  • 0.56% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.11% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages