Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
47.4% pass rate
from 1,067 tests in 2017
(19% worse than other 1996 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Stop lamp (87% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear lamps (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.19% fail on Switch
        • 0.094% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.94% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Fog lamp (63% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.094% fail on Switch
    • 0.75% fail on Horn
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.094% fail on Lamp
      • 0.094% fail on Switch
    • 0.094% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 23% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
    • 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.66% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms (87% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.0% fail on Front
      • 0.47% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.94% fail on Anti-roll bars (68% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers (62% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition (62% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Coil springs (70% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Axle beam (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Swivel joints/housing
      • 0.094% fail on Clearance
    • 0.19% fail on Bonded suspension (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.094% fail on Other components
    • 0.094% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment
    • 0.094% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 21% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels (91% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.094% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.5% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.19% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.094% fail on Operation
    • 3.9% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.56% fail on Brake pads (64% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.094% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.094% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake control components (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.094% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.094% fail on Lever
  • 21% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 13% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system (48% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe
      • 0.19% fail on Cap
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.6% fail on Washers (62% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.56% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres (33% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.3% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.094% fail on Body security
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (45% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (43% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.56% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.094% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.094% fail on Steering control
      • 0.094% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.094% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.094% fail on Power steering
      • 0.094% fail on Drive system
    • 0.094% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (55% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (71% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.28% fail on Requirements
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment
    • 0.56% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.56% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.56% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.094% fail on Condition
    • 0.094% fail on Attachment
  • 0.094% fail on Towbars
    • 0.094% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages