MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 106 » 1995

Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
49.1% pass rate
from 373 tests in 2020
(32% worse than other 1995 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.54% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
        • 0.27% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 0.54% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators (90% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type (90% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.54% fail on Switch (26 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.4% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.80% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Position lamp
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 13% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.54% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.27% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.27% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.54% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (68% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (98% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.80% fail on Axles
      • 0.80% fail on Axle (23 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Visibility (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers (88% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Transmission (82% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (99% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.27% fail on Joints
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
      • 0.27% fail on Hose
      • 0.27% fail on System
    • 0.80% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
      • 0.27% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
    • 0.54% fail on Steering linkage components (79% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages