Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
52.5% pass rate
from 457 tests in 2017
(16% worse than other 1994 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (47% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (77% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Rear wheels (96% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.3% fail on Components
        • 4.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.88% fail on Hoses
        • 0.22% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 0.88% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
        • 0.66% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.22% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.22% fail on Cable
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.44% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.66% fail on Battery
    • 0.44% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.44% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.2% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.0% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.22% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Fitment
    • 0.88% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.44% fail on Front
      • 0.44% fail on Rear
    • 0.44% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.22% fail on Location
    • 0.22% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (86% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 14% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Washers (74% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 2.0% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (51% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
      • 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Requirements
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (61% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Steering system
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages