Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
50.9% pass rate
from 112 tests in 2020
(35% worse than other 1992 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.89% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 6.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.8% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.89% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.89% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.89% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.89% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.89% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.89% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.89% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.89% fail on Horn
    • 0.89% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.89% fail on Position lamp
  • 15% fail on Visibility (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 11% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on View to rear (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Mirrors (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.89% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.89% fail on Windscreen
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 9.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.89% fail on Axles
      • 0.89% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.89% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.89% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.89% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.89% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage
    • 0.89% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
    • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.7% fail on Chassis
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Seats
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.89% fail on Tank
    • 0.89% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.89% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.89% fail on Doors
      • 0.89% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.89% fail on Door condition
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.89% fail on Condition
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.89% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.89% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.89% fail on Steering column
    • 0.89% fail on Steering play
      • 0.89% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.89% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.89% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.89% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.89% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages