MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 1007 » 2005

Peugeot 1007 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.7% pass rate
from 989 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 1007 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Springs (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Coil springs (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Coil spring (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Mounting
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.91% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.91% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.51% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.51% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Position lamp
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (29% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (42% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.91% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
        • 0.10% fail on Linkage
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.10% fail on View to rear
      • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's door (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 0.40% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.10% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.10% fail on Chassis
      • 0.10% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.10% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Airbags
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.71% fail on Power steering
      • 0.71% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (52% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.61% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.30% fail on Compression ignition (78% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.51% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.10% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.10% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages