Lexus GS MOT Results
Registered in 199760.8% pass rate
from 199 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus GS is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps
- 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.5% fail on Battery
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
0.50% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp
-
0.50% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 1.0% fail on Horn
-
0.50% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Front wheels
- 2.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.50% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.5% fail on
Components
- 2.5% fail on Pipes
- 0.50% fail on Hoses
- 0.50% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.50% fail on Leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Components
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.50% fail on Brake linings
- 0.50% fail on Brake discs
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on ABS
- 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.50% fail on Electronic stability system
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(85% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Component mounting (81% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.50% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.50% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.50% fail on Attachment
-
0.50% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.50% fail on Condition
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.0% fail on Emissions
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.5% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
5.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.50% fail on Mirrors
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.50% fail on Steering rack
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
-
1.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(82% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(80% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.50% fail on Chassis
- 0.50% fail on Body condition
-
0.50% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
0.50% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.50% fail on Attachment
-
0.50% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.50% fail on Registration plate