Hyundai i40 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.1% pass rate
from 4,074 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i40 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.3% fail on Tyres (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.098% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.074% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Brakes (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.59% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.025% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.025% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.049% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.025% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 3.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.074% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.59% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.074% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.098% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.049% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.074% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.049% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 2.5% fail on Visibility
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.49% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.025% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.025% fail on View to rear
      • 0.025% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.54% fail on Suspension
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.049% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.29% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.098% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.098% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.025% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.27% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.074% fail on Transmission
      • 0.049% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.049% fail on Joints
      • 0.025% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.025% fail on Joints
    • 0.074% fail on Doors
      • 0.074% fail on Front passenger's door (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.025% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.025% fail on System
    • 0.025% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.025% fail on Seats
      • 0.025% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Steering
    • 0.098% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
    • 0.074% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.025% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.025% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.025% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.074% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.074% fail on Condition
    • 0.074% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages