Hyundai i40 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
73.6% pass rate
from 3,786 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i40 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.1% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (48% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (55% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.026% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.63% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.63% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on Individual lamps (66% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps (89% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Front lamps (86% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Battery
    • 0.053% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.026% fail on Horn
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Hub components (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs (91% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.45% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Components (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Hoses
        • 0.026% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.053% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability system (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.079% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.079% fail on Electronic parking brake
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.18% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
    • 0.026% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering system (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.079% fail on Locking devices (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  • 2.2% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Front (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Coil springs (74% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (68% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.13% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.079% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.053% fail on Bonded suspension (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Condition
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment
    • 0.053% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.053% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.026% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.026% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.026% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.026% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.026% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 0.50% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.053% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.026% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.053% fail on Doors
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers
  • 0.11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (84% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.053% fail on Cap
    • 0.026% fail on Emissions
    • 0.026% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages