Honda Stream MOT Results

Registered in 2004
55.2% pass rate
from 335 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Stream is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.30% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.7% fail on Headlamps (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Headlamp (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.30% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 8.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Battery
  • 13% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.60% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.30% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.90% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Hub components
      • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (98% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (59% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Components
        • 2.1% fail on Pipes
    • 0.90% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
        • 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.60% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
  • 0.90% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.90% fail on Body condition
  • 0.60% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering system
      • 0.30% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.30% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.60% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages