Honda Stream MOT Results
Registered in 200252.2% pass rate
from 816 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Stream is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Front lamps (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.12% fail on All position lamps
- 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Tell tale
- 1.2% fail on Battery
- 0.49% fail on Horn
- 0.37% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.12% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.12% fail on Tell tales
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(18% better than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Linkage condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.49% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
3.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.1% fail on Component mounting
- 0.25% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (43% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.98% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.74% fail on Condition
-
0.61% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.12% fail on Front
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 2002 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.3% fail on Front wheels
- 0.49% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Brake operation
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
- 3.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs
- 0.37% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Components
(67% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pipes (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Hoses
- 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Leaks
-
2.0% fail on
Components
(67% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.25% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.12% fail on ABS
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 4.0% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.49% fail on Mirrors
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
- 0.12% fail on Valve stem
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Emissions
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Hose
- 0.12% fail on Cap
-
3.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.5% fail on Body condition
-
0.98% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.98% fail on Chassis
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
- 0.37% fail on Passengers other
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.25% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.25% fail on
Load security
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Tailgate
- 0.12% fail on Loading door
- 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Body security
-
3.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
-
0.25% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.98% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment