MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » Stream » 2002

Honda Stream MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.1% pass rate
from 376 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Stream is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 7.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.80% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Coil spring (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.80% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.53% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.53% fail on Rear reflectors (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Washers (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (69% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Panel
      • 0.53% fail on Other body component
    • 0.80% fail on Chassis
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.53% fail on Spare wheel (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Carrier (51 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Load security
      • 0.27% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.27% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.27% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.27% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.27% fail on Undertray
  • 7.4% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.53% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.53% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.27% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.27% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.53% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.27% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.27% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages