Honda Stream MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.2% pass rate
from 816 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Stream is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Front lamps (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.49% fail on Horn
    • 0.37% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Front drive shafts (80% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.86% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.12% fail on Front
  • 12% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.49% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Components (67% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Pipes (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Hoses
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Leaks
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
        • 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on ABS
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.49% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Hose
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
  • 3.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition
    • 0.98% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.98% fail on Chassis
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.25% fail on Load security (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.12% fail on Loading door
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
  • 3.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Steering system (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages