Volvo XC90 MOT Results
Registered in 200351.8% pass rate
from 1,501 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC90 is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(66% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
19% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 10.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (32 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (43 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (69% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.13% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.067% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.067% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(46% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.067% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.067% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.067% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.067% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.40% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(92% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance (89% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.067% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.067% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
19% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.067% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.87% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Brake linings
-
0.73% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
- 0.067% fail on Brake drums
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.20% fail on Cable
-
0.93% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.53% fail on Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
- 0.67% fail on Rigid brake pipes (83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.067% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.067% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.067% fail on Leaks
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Headlamps
(34% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp (43% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.87% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.067% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.067% fail on Arm
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.33% fail on Position lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.33% fail on Horn
-
0.067% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.067% fail on Switch
-
0.067% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.067% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
7.1% fail on
Headlamps
(34% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Ball joint
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (89% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.00% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.27% fail on Linkage
- 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.067% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.73% fail on
Springs
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Wheel bearings (54% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Suspension rods
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.067% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(25% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Transmission
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.9% fail on Joints
- 0.13% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.13% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.13% fail on Joints
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.93% fail on
Doors
-
0.40% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.40% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.33% fail on Door condition
-
0.20% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.20% fail on Door condition
-
0.40% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.47% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.27% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.20% fail on Bracket (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.067% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.067% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.067% fail on Bumpers
-
0.067% fail on
Body
- 0.067% fail on Body condition
-
0.067% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.067% fail on Boot lid condition
-
3.1% fail on
Transmission
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
(39% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint
- 0.33% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Power steering
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Other components
- 0.067% fail on Rams
-
0.93% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.87% fail on Steering rack
- 0.067% fail on Operation
-
0.80% fail on
Steering play
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Steering wheel (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Electronic power steering
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.067% fail on Size/type
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
View to rear
- 0.47% fail on Mirrors
- 0.067% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
-
4.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts
(50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 0.067% fail on Pre-tensioners
-
0.067% fail on
Airbags
- 0.067% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (75% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.53% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.067% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.067% fail on Catalytic converter
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.67% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Other leaks
- 0.067% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.067% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.73% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Registration plates (69% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.067% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo XC90 (2002 - 2015)
Handsome-looking, safe seven-seater brimming with kit and practical touches in its high-quality cabin. D5 is the one to go for.