Volvo XC60 MOT Results

Registered in 2017
87.2% pass rate
from 15,051 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition (24% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.027% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (95% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.26% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.093% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.053% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.047% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0066% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.066% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.060% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.047% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.020% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.0066% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0066% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0066% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 3.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Headlamps (39% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.020% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.020% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.0066% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0066% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0066% fail on Horn
  • 2.1% fail on Visibility (43% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (47% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.040% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.013% fail on View to rear
      • 0.013% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0066% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.51% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Springs
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (79% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.027% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (60% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.013% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.040% fail on Spark ignition (87% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0066% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0066% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Transmission
      • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.060% fail on Joints
    • 0.033% fail on Body
      • 0.020% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0066% fail on Body condition
      • 0.0066% fail on Panel
    • 0.027% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.020% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.013% fail on System (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.020% fail on Seats
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.013% fail on Towbar (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Other towbar components (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Doors
      • 0.0066% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0066% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0066% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0066% fail on Door condition
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.15% fail on Steering
    • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0066% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.027% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.027% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0066% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0066% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.040% fail on Road Wheels (75% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.0066% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0066% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Volvo XC60 (2017 on)
    Premium image, supported by handsome styling and a luxurious interior. Drives with refinement, and strong performance across the engine range. Lots of safety equipment included.
  • Volvo XC60 (2008 - 2017)
    Comfortable and refined. Good long-distance car. Stylish cabin and R Design models look sporty.

    Search Good Garages