Volvo XC60 MOT Results
Registered in 201787.2% pass rate
from 15,051 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition (24% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.027% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Brakes
(55% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(95% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Brake linings
-
0.32% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Brake performance
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.093% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.073% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.053% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.047% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0066% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.047% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.047% fail on
Service brake performance
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.047% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0066% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.0066% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0066% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0066% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0066% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0066% fail on
Decelerometer
-
0.093% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.066% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.060% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.053% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.047% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.020% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0066% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.0066% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0066% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(95% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(22% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.84% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Headlamps
(39% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.52% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.020% fail on Position lamp
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.020% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.0066% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0066% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0066% fail on Horn
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(22% better than other 2017 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Visibility
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Wipers (47% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.040% fail on Windscreen
-
0.013% fail on
View to rear
- 0.013% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0066% fail on Bonnet
-
0.51% fail on
Suspension
(42% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Springs
-
0.23% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.23% fail on Coil spring
-
0.23% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.21% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.027% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.23% fail on
Springs
-
0.24% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.24% fail on Registration plates
-
0.22% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.013% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.040% fail on
Spark ignition
(87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.013% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0066% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0066% fail on Other leaks
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Transmission
-
0.060% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.060% fail on Joints
-
0.060% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.033% fail on
Body
- 0.020% fail on Other body component
- 0.0066% fail on Body condition
- 0.0066% fail on Panel
- 0.027% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.020% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.013% fail on System (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0066% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.020% fail on
Seats
- 0.020% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.013% fail on
Towbar
(14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Other towbar components (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Doors
-
0.0066% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0066% fail on Door condition
-
0.0066% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0066% fail on Door condition
-
0.0066% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.060% fail on
Transmission
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.15% fail on
Steering
-
0.11% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.11% fail on Track rod end
- 0.0066% fail on Locking devices
-
0.027% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0066% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.0066% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.11% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.040% fail on
Road Wheels
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0066% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0066% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review